The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development of a Novel Echocardiography Ramp Test for Speed Optimization and Diagnosis of Device Thrombosis in Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices
Open accessAbstract
Objective Develop a novel approach of optimizing continuous flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) function and diagnosing device malfunctions. Background In CF-LVAD patients, the dynamic interaction of device speed, left and right ventricular decompression, and valve function can be assessed during an echocardiography-monitored speed ramp-test. Methods We devised a unique ramp-test protocol to be routinely done at the time of discharge for speed optimization and/or if device malfunction was suspected. The patient’s left ventricular end diastolic dimension (LVEDD), frequency of aortic valve (AV) opening, valvular insufficiency, blood pressure, and CF-LVAD parameters were recorded at increments of 400 rpm from 8,000 rpm to 12,000 rpm. The results of the speed designations were plotted, and linear function slopes for LVEDD, PI, and power were calculated. Results Fifty-two ramp-tests from 39 patients were prospectively collected and analyzed. Twenty-eight ramp-tests were performed for speed optimization, and speed was changed in 17 (61%) with a mean absolute value adjustment of 424±211 rpm. Seventeen patients had ramp-tests performed for suspected device thrombosis and 10 tests were suspicious for device thrombosis; these patients were then treated with intensified anticoagulation and/or device exchange/emergent transplant. Device thrombosis was confirmed in 8/10 cases at the time of emergent device exchange or transplant. All patients with device thrombosis, but none of the remaining patients, had a LVEDD slope > −0.16. Conclusion Ramp-tests facilitated optimal speed changes and device malfunction detection, and may be used to monitor the effects of therapeutic interventions and need for surgical intervention in CF-LVAD patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves
Robin, X., Turck, N., Hainard, A., Tiberti, N., Lisacek, F., Sanchez, J.-C., & Müller, M. (2011) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-77 · Cited by 13,697
Cited by
Stainback, R. F., Estep, J. D., Agler, D. A., Birks, E. J., Bremer, M., Hung, J., Kirkpatrick, J. N., Rogers, J. G., & Shah, N. R. (2015) · Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography · doi:10.1016/j.echo.2015.05.008 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Uriel, N., Morrison, K. A., Garan, A. R., Kato, T. S., Yuzefpolskaya, M., Latif, F., Restaino, S. W., Mancini, D. M., Flannery, M., Takayama, H., John, R., Colombo, P. C., Naka, Y., & Jorde, U. P.
- Venue
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-10
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 1764-1775
- ISSN
- 0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1545907120
- Cited by
- 352
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development of a Novel Echocardiography Ramp Test for Speed Optimization and Diagnosis of Device Thrombosis in Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.052
- The paper
- Uriel, N., Morrison, K. A., Garan, A. R., Kato, T. S., Yuzefpolskaya, M., Latif, F., Restaino, S. W., Mancini, D. M., Flannery, M., Takayama, H., John, R., Colombo, P. C., Naka, Y., & Jorde, U. P. (2012). Development of a Novel Echocardiography Ramp Test for Speed Optimization and Diagnosis of Device Thrombosis in Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.052
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.