Cited by 274Cardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsCoronary Interventions and DiagnosticsAortic Disease and Treatment Approaches

Severe Aortic Stenosis and Coronary Artery Disease—Implications for Management in the Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Era

Open access
Goel, Sachin S., Ige, Mobolaji, Tuzcu, E. Murat, Ellis, Stephen G., Stewart, William J., Svensson, Lars G., Lytle, Bruce W., Kapadia, Samir R.·2013·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Management of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) referred for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is posing challenges. Due to limited and heterogeneous data on the prevalence and clinical impact of CAD on the outcomes of TAVR and the management strategies for CAD in patients undergoing TAVR, we performed a comprehensive review of the literature. Significant CAD is present in 40% to 75% of patients undergoing TAVR. The impact of CAD on outcomes after TAVR remains understudied. Based on existing data, not all patients require revascularization before TAVR. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) should be considered for severely stenotic lesions in proximal coronaries that subtend a large area of myocardium at risk. Ongoing studies randomizing patients to surgical or percutaneous management strategies for severe AS will help provide valuable data regarding the impact of CAD on TAVR outcomes, the role of PCI, and its timing in relation to TAVR.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.01.096

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • With the emergence of TAVR, decisions about treating coronary disease have become more complex, including which lesions to treat, how to treat them and when to treat them.

    “With the emergence of TAVR, decisions regarding the treatment of coronary disease have become more complex, including which coronary lesions to treat versus leave alone, how to treat them (percutaneous versus bypass) and when to treat them (before, during, or after valve replacement)247.”

    From Calcific aortic stenosis (2016) · cites this paper as [247]

  • The way coronary disease should influence decisions between TAVR and surgical valve replacement is unclear in some scenarios.

    “The way in which coronary disease should influence decisions between valve replacement with TAVR versus surgical valve replacement is also unclear in some scenarios.”

    From Calcific aortic stenosis (2016) · cites this paper as [247]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 65 · Cited by 274

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [5]5. Goel et al. JACC Vol. 62, No. 1, 2013 Severe Aortic Stenosis and Coronary Disease July 2, 2013:1-10
  2. [46]46. Khawaja MZ, Asrress KN, Haran H, et al. The effects of pre-existing significant coronary artery disease defined by QCA analysis upon outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the Edwards bioprosthesis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58 Suppl:B201-2. JACC Vol. 62, No. 1, 2013

Authors
Goel, S. S., Ige, M., Tuzcu, E. M., Ellis, S. G., Stewart, W. J., Svensson, L. G., Lytle, B. W., & Kapadia, S. R.
Affiliations
Cleveland Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Kapadia, Samir R.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-07
Volume
62
Issue
1
Pages
1-10
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W173091792
Cited by
274
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 2
FWCI
3.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
Keywords
severe aortic stenosis, coronary artery disease, transcatheter aortic valve implantation, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary revascularization, timing of revascularization, TAVR outcomes, myocardial ischemia
MeSH terms
Animals, Aortic Valve, Aortic Valve Stenosis, Coronary Artery Disease, Cardiac Catheterization, Humans, Severity of Illness Index, Disease Management, Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review