The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Clinical Outcomes and Improved Survival in Patients With Protein-Losing Enteropathy After the Fontan Operation
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND Patients with protein-losing enteropathy (PLE) following the Fontan operation have a reported 50% mortality at 5 years after diagnosis. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to review outcomes in patients with PLE following the Fontan operation. METHODS From 1992 to 2010, 42 patients (55% male) with PLE following the Fontan operation were identified from clinical databases at the Mayo Clinic. Data were collected retrospectively. RESULTS Mean age at PLE diagnosis was 18.9 ± 11.0 years. Initial Fontan operation was performed at 10.1 ± 10.8 years of age. Mean time from Fontan operation to PLE diagnosis was 8.4 ± 14.2 years. Survival was 88% at 5 years. Decreased survival was seen in patients with high Fontan pressure (mean >15 mm Hg; p = 0.04), decreased ventricular function (ejection fraction <55%; p = 0.03), and New York Heart Association functional class >2 at diagnosis (p = 0.04). Patients who died had higher pulmonary vascular resistance (3.8 ± 1.6 Wood units [WU] vs. 2.1 ± 1.1 WU; p = 0.017), lower cardiac index (1.6 ± 0.4 l/min/m(2) vs. 2.7 ± 0.7 l/min/m(2); p < 0.0001), and lower mixed venous saturation (53% vs. 66%; p = 0.01), compared with survivors. Factors were assessed at the time of PLE diagnosis. Treatments used more frequently in survivors with PLE included spironolactone (21 [68%]), octreotide (7 [21%]), sildenafil (6 [19%]), fenestration creation (15 [48%]), and relief of Fontan obstruction (7 [23%]). CONCLUSIONS PLE remains difficult to treat; however, in the current era, survival has improved with advances in treatment. Further study is needed to better understand the mechanism of disease and ideal treatment strategy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of adult congenital heart disease
Baumgartner, H., De Backer, J., Babu-Narayan, S. V., Budts, W., Chessa, M., Diller, G.-P., lung, B., Kluin, J., Lang, I. M., Meijboom, F., et al. (2021) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa554 · Cited by 2,311
Stout, K. K., Daniels, C. J., Aboulhosn, J. A., Bozkurt, B., Broberg, C. S., Colman, J. M., Crumb, S. R., Dearani, J. A., Fuller, S., Gurvitz, M., et al. (2019) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000603 · Cited by 1,602
2018 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Adults With Congenital Heart Disease
Stout, K. K., Daniels, C. J., Aboulhosn, J. A., Bozkurt, B., Broberg, C. S., Colman, J. M., Crumb, S. R., Dearani, J. A., Fuller, S., Gurvitz, M., et al. (2019) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.1029 · Cited by 1,080
40-Year Follow-Up After the Fontan Operation
Pundi, K. N., Johnson, J. N., Dearani, J. A., Pundi, K. N., Li, Z., Hinck, C. A., Dahl, S. H., Cannon, B. C., O’Leary, P. W., Driscoll, D. J., et al. (2015) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2015.07.065 · Cited by 649
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- John, A. S., Johnson, J. A., Khan, M., Driscoll, D. J., Warnes, C. A., & Cetta, F.
- Venue
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-07
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 54-62
- ISSN
- 0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2034753687
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical Outcomes and Improved Survival in Patients With Protein-Losing Enteropathy After the Fontan Operation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.04.025
- The paper
- John, A. S., Johnson, J. A., Khan, M., Driscoll, D. J., Warnes, C. A., & Cetta, F. (2014). Clinical Outcomes and Improved Survival in Patients With Protein-Losing Enteropathy After the Fontan Operation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.04.025
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.