Cited by 349Medication Adherence and ComplianceAcute Myocardial Infarction ResearchCardiac Health and Mental Health

A Polypill Strategy to Improve Adherence

Open access
Castellano, José M., Sanz, Ginés, Peñalvo, José L., Bansilal, Sameer, Fernández-Ortiz, Antonio, Alvarez, Luz, Guzmán, Luis, Linares, Juan Carlos +16 more·2014·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Background Adherence to evidence-based cardiovascular (CV) medications after an acute myocardial infarction (MI) is low after the first 6 months. The use of fixed-dose combinations (FDC) has been shown to improve treatment adherence and risk factor control. However, no previous randomized trial has analyzed the impact of a polypill strategy on adherence in post-MI patients.Objectives The cross-sectional FOCUS (Fixed-Dose Combination Drug for Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention) study (Phase 1) aimed to elucidate factors that interfere with appropriate adherence to CV medications for secondary prevention after an acute MI. Additionally, 695 patients from Phase 1 were randomized into a controlled trial (Phase 2) to test the effect of a polypill (containing aspirin 100 mg, simvastatin 40 mg, and ramipril 2.5, 5, or 10 mg) compared with the 3 drugs given separately on adherence, blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, as well as safety and tolerability over a period of 9 months of follow-up.Methods In Phase 1, a 5-country cohort of 2,118 patients was analyzed. Patients were randomized to either the polypill or 3 drugs separately for Phase 2. Primary endpoint was adherence to the treatment measured at the final visit by the self-reported Morisky-Green questionnaire (MAQ) and pill count (patients had to meet both criteria for adherence at the in-person visit to be considered adherent).Results In Phase 1, overall CV medication adherence, defined as an MAQ score of 20, was 45.5%. In a multivariable regression model, the risk of being nonadherent (MAQ <20) was associated with younger age, depression, being on a complex medication regimen, poorer health insurance coverage, and a lower level of social support, with consistent findings across countries. In Phase 2, the polypill group showed improved adherence compared with the group receiving separate medications after 9 months of follow-up: 50.8% versus 41% (p = 0.019; intention-to-treat population) and 65.7% versus 55.7% (p = 0.012; per protocol population) when using the primary endpoint, attending the final visit with MAQ = 20 and high pill count (80% to 110%) combined, to assess adherence. Adherence also was higher in the FDC group when measured by MAQ alone (68% vs. 59%, p = 0.049). No treatment difference was found at follow-up in mean systolic blood pressure (129.6 mm Hg vs. 128.6 mm Hg), mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (89.9 mg/dl vs. 91.7 mg/dl), serious adverse events (23 vs. 21), or death (1, 0.3% in each group).Conclusions For secondary prevention following acute MI, younger age, depression, and a complex drug treatment plan are associated with lower medication adherence. Meanwhile, adherence is increased in patients with higher insurance coverage levels and social support. Compared with the 3 drugs given separately, the use of a polypill strategy met the primary endpoint for adherence for secondary prevention following an acute MI. (Fixed Dose Combination Drug [Polypill] for Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention [FOCUS]; NCT01321255).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.08.021

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adherence measured with the self-reported Morisky-Green questionnaire and pill counts was statistically significantly superior in the intervention group compared with usual care at 9 months.

    “Adherence was measured with the selfreported MoriskyeGreen questionnaire and pill counts and was statistically significantly superior in the intervention group compared with usual care at 9 months.”

    From 2016 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias (2016) · cites this paper as [483]

  • In phase 1 of FOCUS, factors associated with non-adherence were younger age, depression, complex regimen, poorer health insurance coverage and low social support.

    “In phase 1, factors associated with non-adherence were younger age, depression, complex regimen, poorer health insurance coverage and low social support.”

    From 2016 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias (2016) · cites this paper as [483]

  • In the second phase of FOCUS, 695 patients from the first phase were randomized to receive either a polypill containing aspirin, a statin and ramipril in varying doses or the three drugs separately.

    “In the second phase, 695 patients from the first phase were randomized to receive either a polypill containing aspirin, statin and ramipril in varying doses or were given the three drugs separately.”

    From 2016 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias (2016) · cites this paper as [483]

  • The FOCUS study had a cross-sectional first phase that identified factors contributing to non-adherence after myocardial infarction in 2118 patients from five countries in South America and Europe.

    “The Fixed-Dose Combination Drug for Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention (FOCUS) study 483 had a cross-sectional first phase, which identified factors contributing to nonadherence after MI in 2118 patients from five countries in South America and Europe.”

    From 2016 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias (2016) · cites this paper as [483]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 21 · Cited by 349

Authors
Castellano, J. M., Sanz, G., Peñalvo, J. L., Bansilal, S., Fernández-Ortiz, A., Alvarez, L., Guzmán, L., Linares, J. C., García, F., D’Aniello, F., Arnáiz, J. A., Varea, S., Martínez, F., Lorenzatti, A., Imaz, I., Sánchez-Gómez, L. M., Roncaglioni, M. C., Baviera, M., Smith, S. C., Taubert, K., Pocock, S., Brotons, C., Farkouh, M. E., & Fuster, V.
Affiliations
  • Spanish National Centre for Cardiovascular Research (ES)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Ferrer Grupo (Spain) (ES)
  • Fundació Clínic per a la Recerca Biomèdica (ES)
  • Instituto Médico DAMIC (AR)
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES)
  • Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research (IT)
  • World Heart Federation (CH)
  • EAP Sardenya (ES)
  • University Health Network (CA)
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
64
Issue
20
Pages
2071-2082
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W63425872
Cited by
349
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
40.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Keywords
polypill, fixed-dose combination, medication adherence, acute myocardial infarction, secondary prevention, aspirin, simvastatin, ramipril, Morisky-Green questionnaire, pill count, depression, social support, health insurance coverage, medication regimen complexity, blood pressure, LDL cholesterol, cardiovascular drugs, FOCUS study, drug safety and tolerability
MeSH terms
Aged, Cardiovascular Agents, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cross-Sectional Studies, Drug Combinations, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Prospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Medication Adherence, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review