Cited by 139Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Patient selection in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction clinical trials

Open access
Kelly, Jacob P., Mentz, Robert J., Mebazaa, Alexandre, Voors, Adriaan A., Butler, Javed, Roessig, Lothar, Fiuzat, Mona, Zannad, Faiez +3 more·2015·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Recent clinical trials in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have provided important insights into participant selection strategies. Historically, HFpEF trials have included patients with relatively preserved left ventricular ejection fraction ranging from 40% to 55% and a clinical history of heart failure. Contemporary HFpEF trials have also incorporated inclusion criteria such as hospitalization for HFpEF, altered functional capacity, cardiac structural and functional abnormalities, and abnormalities in neurohormonal status (e.g., elevated natriuretic peptide levels). Careful analyses of the effect of these patient selection criteria on outcomes in prior trials provide valuable lessons for future trial design. We review recent and ongoing HFpEF clinical trials from a patient selection perspective and appraise trial patient selection methodologies in relation to outcomes. This review reflects discussions between clinicians, scientists, trialists, regulators, and regulatory representatives at the 10th Global CardioVascular Clinical Trialists Forum in Paris, France, on December 6, 2013.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.03.043

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Natriuretic peptide levels are part of the diagnostic assessment of HFpEF, although natriuretic peptide levels are elevated in AF patients and the optimum diagnostic cut-off is still unknown.

    “Natriuretic peptide levels are part of the diagnostic assessment of HFpEF, 222 although natriuretic peptide levels are elevated in AF patients and the optimum diagnostic cut-off is still unknown.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 101 · Cited by 139

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [17]Mentz RJ Kelly JP von Lueder TG Noncardiac comorbidities in heart failure with reduced versus preserved ejection fraction J Am Coll Cardiol 2014 64 2281 2293 25456761 PMC4254505

Authors
Kelly, J. P., Mentz, R. J., Mebazaa, A., Voors, A. A., Butler, J., Roessig, L., Fiuzat, M., Zannad, F., Pitt, B., O’Connor, C. M., & Lam, C. S. P.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR)
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • Stony Brook University (US)
  • Bayer (Germany) (DE)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • National Heart Centre Singapore (SG)
Corresponding author
Kelly, Jacob P.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-04
Volume
65
Issue
16
Pages
1668-1682
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2129043636
Cited by
139
References
101
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 5
FWCI
2.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Amgen
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • AstraZeneca
  • Gilead Sciences
  • Thoratec Corporation
  • Alere
  • Boston Scientific Corporation
  • HeartWare
  • BG Medicine
  • ResMed
  • Bayer HealthCare
  • National Institutes of Health (5 T32 HL)
  • Relypsa
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (T32HL007101, 5 T32 HL 7101-39)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, patient selection, trial inclusion criteria, trial design, natriuretic peptides, left ventricular ejection fraction, heart failure hospitalization, functional capacity, cardiac structural abnormalities, trial outcomes
MeSH terms
Atrial Fibrillation, Clinical Trials as Topic, Heart Failure, Hemodynamics, Humans, Stroke Volume, Patient Selection, Natriuretic Peptides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review