Cited by 204Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthAcute Myocardial Infarction ResearchAntiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases

Atherothrombotic risk stratification and ezetimibe for secondary prevention

Open access
Bohula, Erin A., Morrow, David A., Giugliano, Robert P., Blazing, Michael A., He, Ping, Park, Jeong-Gun, Murphy, Sabina A., White, Jennifer A. +6 more·2017·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Background Ezetimibe improves cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in patients stabilized after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) when added to statin therapy. After ACS, patients vary considerably in their risk for recurrent CV events.Objectives This study tested the hypothesis that atherothrombotic risk stratification may be useful to identify post-ACS patients who have the greatest potential for benefit from the addition of ezetimibe to statin therapy.Methods The TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) Risk Score for Secondary Prevention (TRS 2°P) is a simple 9-point risk stratification tool, previously developed in a large population with atherothrombosis to predict CV death, myocardial infarction (MI), and ischemic stroke (CV death/MI/ischemic cerebrovascular accident [iCVA]). The current study applied this tool prospectively to 17,717 post-ACS patients randomized either to ezetimibe and simvastatin or to placebo and simvastatin in IMPROVE-IT (Improved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial). Treatment efficacy was assessed by baseline risk for CV death/MI/iCVA, the IMPROVE-IT composite endpoints (CE), and individual component endpoints at 7 years.Results All 9 clinical variables in the TRS 2°P were independent risk indicators for CV death/MI/iCVA (p < 0.001). The integer-based scheme showed a strong graded relationship with the rate of CV death/MI/iCVA, the trial CE, and the individual components (p trend <0.0001 for each). High-risk patients (n = 4,393; 25%), defined by ≥3 risk indicators, had a 6.3% (95% confidence interval: 2.9% to 9.7%) absolute risk reduction in CV death/MI/iCVA at 7 years with ezetimibe/simvastatin, thus translating to a number-needed-to-treat of 16. Intermediate-risk patients (2 risk indicators; n = 5,292; 30%) had a 2.2% (95% confidence interval: -0.3% to 4.6%) absolute risk reduction. Low-risk patients (0 to 1 risk indicators; n = 8,032; 45%) did not appear to derive benefit from the addition of ezetimibe (p interaction = 0.010). Similar findings were observed for the IMPROVE-IT primary CE.Conclusions Atherothrombotic risk stratification using the TRS 2°P identifies high-risk patients who derive greatest benefit from the addition of ezetimibe to statin therapy for secondary prevention after ACS. (Improved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial [IMPROVE-IT]; NCT00202878).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.11.070

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 204

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Balakrishnan N, Rao CR, editors. Handbook of Statistics, Survival Methods, Vol. 23. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier, 2004:1-25.

Authors
Bohula, E. A., Morrow, D. A., Giugliano, R. P., Blazing, M. A., He, P., Park, J.-G., Murphy, S. A., White, J. A., Kesaniemi, Y. A., Pedersen, T. R., Brady, A. J., Mitchel, Y., Cannon, C. P., & Braunwald, E.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
  • Glasgow Royal Infirmary (GB)
  • Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Bohula, Erin A.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-02
Volume
69
Issue
8
Pages
911-921
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2589921037
Cited by
204
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 14
FWCI
29.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • AstraZeneca
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Gilead Sciences
  • Daiichi-Sankyo
  • Eisai
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
Keywords
ezetimibe, acute coronary syndrome, secondary prevention, simvastatin, IMPROVE-IT trial, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, lipid-lowering therapy, risk prediction, number needed to treat, statin therapy, cardiovascular risk reduction
MeSH terms
Ezetimibe, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Prospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Simvastatin, Acute Coronary Syndrome, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review