Palliative Care in Heart Failure
Open accessAbstract
Background Advanced heart failure (HF) is characterized by high morbidity and mortality. Conventional therapy may not sufficiently reduce patient suffering and maximize quality of life.Objectives The authors investigated whether an interdisciplinary palliative care intervention in addition to evidence-based HF care improves certain outcomes.Methods The authors randomized 150 patients with advanced HF between August 15, 2012, and June 25, 2015, to usual care (UC) (n = 75) or UC plus a palliative care intervention (UC + PAL) (n = 75) at a single center. Primary endpoints were 2 quality-of-life measurements, the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) overall summary and the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative Care scale (FACIT-Pal), assessed at 6 months. Secondary endpoints included assessments of depression and anxiety (measured via the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS]), spiritual well-being (measured via the FACIT-Spiritual Well-Being scale [FACIT-Sp]), hospitalizations, and mortality.Results Patients randomized to UC + PAL versus UC alone had clinically significant incremental improvement in KCCQ and FACIT-Pal scores from randomization to 6 months (KCCQ difference = 9.49 points, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94 to 18.05, p = 0.030; FACIT-Pal difference = 11.77 points, 95% CI: 0.84 to 22.71, p = 0.035). Depression improved in UC + PAL patients (HADS-depression difference = -1.94 points; p = 0.020) versus UC-alone patients, with similar findings for anxiety (HADS-anxiety difference = -1.83 points; p = 0.048). Spiritual well-being was improved in UC + PAL versus UC-alone patients (FACIT-Sp difference = 3.98 points; p = 0.027). Randomization to UC + PAL did not affect rehospitalization or mortality.Conclusions An interdisciplinary palliative care intervention in advanced HF patients showed consistently greater benefits in quality of life, anxiety, depression, and spiritual well-being compared with UC alone. (Palliative Care in Heart Failure [PAL-HF]; NCT01589601).
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 90 · Cited by 603
- Authors
- Rogers, J. G., Patel, C. B., Mentz, R. J., Granger, B. B., Steinhauser, K. E., Fiuzat, M., Adams, P. A., Speck, A., Johnson, K. S., Krishnamoorthy, A., Yang, H., Anstrom, K. J., Dodson, G. C., Taylor, D. H., Kirchner, J. L., Mark, D. B., O’Connor, C. M., & Tulsky, J. A.
- Affiliations
- Duke University (US)
- Piedmont HealthCare (US)
- Inova Health System (US)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rogers, Joseph G.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-07
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 331-341
- ISSN
- 0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5664956
- OpenAlex
- W2734966263
- Cited by
- 603
- References
- 90
- Citations by year
- 2026: 58 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 82 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 70 · 2018: 60 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 55.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
- Amgen (R01AG045551-01A1, U10HL110312)
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Eli Lilly and Company
- Pfizer
- AstraZeneca
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Sanofi
- American College of Cardiology Foundation
- Gilead Sciences
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
- Thoratec Corporation
- Health Services Research and Development
- HeartWare
- Luitpold Pharmaceuticals
- ResMed (R01AG045551-01A1)
- Daiichi-Sankyo
- National Institutes of Health (5r01ag042130-03, RO1AG042130)
- National Institute on Aging (K08AG028975, #R01AG042130, R01AG045551)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U10HL110312)
- National Institute of Nursing Research (R01NR013428, RO1AG042130)
- Duke Clinical Research Institute
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
- Keywords
- palliative care, advanced heart failure, quality of life, depression, anxiety, spiritual well-being, multidisciplinary care, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire, hospital readmission, mortality
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Palliative Care, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Severity of Illness Index, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review