Cited by 603Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementPalliative and Oncologic Care

Palliative Care in Heart Failure

Open access
Rogers, Joseph G., Patel, Chetan B., Mentz, Robert J., Granger, Bradi B., Steinhauser, Karen E., Fiuzat, Mona, Adams, Patricia A., Speck, Adam +10 more·2017·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Background Advanced heart failure (HF) is characterized by high morbidity and mortality. Conventional therapy may not sufficiently reduce patient suffering and maximize quality of life.Objectives The authors investigated whether an interdisciplinary palliative care intervention in addition to evidence-based HF care improves certain outcomes.Methods The authors randomized 150 patients with advanced HF between August 15, 2012, and June 25, 2015, to usual care (UC) (n = 75) or UC plus a palliative care intervention (UC + PAL) (n = 75) at a single center. Primary endpoints were 2 quality-of-life measurements, the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) overall summary and the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative Care scale (FACIT-Pal), assessed at 6 months. Secondary endpoints included assessments of depression and anxiety (measured via the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS]), spiritual well-being (measured via the FACIT-Spiritual Well-Being scale [FACIT-Sp]), hospitalizations, and mortality.Results Patients randomized to UC + PAL versus UC alone had clinically significant incremental improvement in KCCQ and FACIT-Pal scores from randomization to 6 months (KCCQ difference = 9.49 points, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94 to 18.05, p = 0.030; FACIT-Pal difference = 11.77 points, 95% CI: 0.84 to 22.71, p = 0.035). Depression improved in UC + PAL patients (HADS-depression difference = -1.94 points; p = 0.020) versus UC-alone patients, with similar findings for anxiety (HADS-anxiety difference = -1.83 points; p = 0.048). Spiritual well-being was improved in UC + PAL versus UC-alone patients (FACIT-Sp difference = 3.98 points; p = 0.027). Randomization to UC + PAL did not affect rehospitalization or mortality.Conclusions An interdisciplinary palliative care intervention in advanced HF patients showed consistently greater benefits in quality of life, anxiety, depression, and spiritual well-being compared with UC alone. (Palliative Care in Heart Failure [PAL-HF]; NCT01589601).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.05.030

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 90 · Cited by 603

Authors
Rogers, J. G., Patel, C. B., Mentz, R. J., Granger, B. B., Steinhauser, K. E., Fiuzat, M., Adams, P. A., Speck, A., Johnson, K. S., Krishnamoorthy, A., Yang, H., Anstrom, K. J., Dodson, G. C., Taylor, D. H., Kirchner, J. L., Mark, D. B., O’Connor, C. M., & Tulsky, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Piedmont HealthCare (US)
  • Inova Health System (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Rogers, Joseph G.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-07
Volume
70
Issue
3
Pages
331-341
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2734966263
Cited by
603
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 58 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 82 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 70 · 2018: 60 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 1
FWCI
55.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • Amgen (R01AG045551-01A1, U10HL110312)
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer
  • AstraZeneca
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Sanofi
  • American College of Cardiology Foundation
  • Gilead Sciences
  • Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
  • Thoratec Corporation
  • Health Services Research and Development
  • HeartWare
  • Luitpold Pharmaceuticals
  • ResMed (R01AG045551-01A1)
  • Daiichi-Sankyo
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ag042130-03, RO1AG042130)
  • National Institute on Aging (K08AG028975, #R01AG042130, R01AG045551)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U10HL110312)
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (R01NR013428, RO1AG042130)
  • Duke Clinical Research Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
palliative care, advanced heart failure, quality of life, depression, anxiety, spiritual well-being, multidisciplinary care, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire, hospital readmission, mortality
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Palliative Care, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Severity of Illness Index, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review