Normal LDL-cholesterol levels are associated with subclinical atherosclerosis in the absence of risk factors
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Absence of cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs) is traditionally considered low risk for atherosclerosis; however, individuals without CVRFs, as currently defined, still have events. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to identify predictors of subclinical atherosclerosis in CVRF-free individuals. METHODS: Participants from the PESA (Progression of Early Subclinical Atherosclerosis) study (n = 4,184) without conventional CVRFs were evaluated (n = 1,779; 45.0 ± 4.1 years, 50.3% women). CVRF freedom was defined as no current smoking and untreated blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg, fasting glucose <126 mg/dl, total cholesterol <240 mg/dl, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) <160 mg/dl, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ≥40 mg/dl. A subgroup with optimal CVRFs (n = 740) was also defined as having blood pressure <120/80 mm Hg, fasting glucose <100 mg/dl, glycosylated hemoglobin <5.7%, and total cholesterol <200 mg/dl. We evaluated ultrasound-detected carotid, iliofemoral, and abdominal aortic plaques; coronary artery calcification; serum biomarkers; and lifestyle. Adjusted odds ratios (with 95% confidence interval) and ordinal logistic regression models were used. RESULTS: Subclinical atherosclerosis (plaque or coronary artery calcification) was present in 49.7% of CVRF-free participants. Together with male sex and age, LDL-C was independently associated with atherosclerosis presence and extent, in both the CVRF-free and CVRF-optimal groups (odds ratio [×10 mg/dl]: 1.14 to 1.18; p < 0.01 for all). Atherosclerosis presence and extent was also associated in the CVRF-free group with glycosylated hemoglobin levels. CONCLUSIONS: Many CVRF-free middle-aged individuals have atherosclerosis. LDL-C, even at levels currently considered normal, is independently associated with the presence and extent of early systemic atherosclerosis in the absence of major CVRFs. These findings support more effective LDL-C lowering for primordial prevention, even in individuals conventionally considered at optimal risk. (Progression of Early Subclinical Atherosclerosis [PESA] Study; NCT01410318).
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
LDL-C is considered the main cause of atherosclerotic plaque development and subsequent cardiovascular events among dyslipidemia factors.
“Among dyslipidemia factors, the main cause of atherosclerotic plaque development and subsequent CV events is considered to be low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (8).”
From Triglycerides and residual atherosclerotic risk (2021) · cites this paper as [8]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 54 · Cited by 378
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Sander D, Schulze-Horn C, Bickel H, Gnahn H, Bartels E, Conrad B. Combined effects of hemo- globin A1c and C-reactive protein on the pro- gression of subclinical carotid atherosclerosis: the INVADE study. Stroke 2006;37:351-7.
- Authors
- Fernández-Friera, L., Fuster, V., López-Melgar, B., Oliva, B., García-Ruiz, J. M., Mendiguren, J., Bueno, H., Pocock, S., Ibáñez, B., Fernández-Ortiz, A., & Sanz, J.
- Affiliations
- Spanish National Centre for Cardiovascular Research (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Sanz, Javier
- Venue
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-12
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 2979-2991
- ISSN
- 0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2773226077
- Cited by
- 378
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 33.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- erratum (2018-02-06)
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (SEV‐2015‐0505)
- Ministerio de Asuntos Económicos y Transformación Digital, Gobierno de España (SEV-2015-0505)
- Instituto de Salud Carlos III (SEV-2015-0505, PI15/02019)
- European Regional Development Fund (SEV-2015-0505)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
- Keywords
- subclinical atherosclerosis, LDL cholesterol, cardiovascular risk factors, carotid plaque, coronary artery calcification, HbA1c, primordial prevention, LDL cholesterol lowering, middle-aged adults, serum biomarkers, lifestyle risk factors
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Cholesterol, LDL, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Ultrasonography, Biomarkers, Disease Progression, Early Diagnosis, Atherosclerosis, Asymptomatic Diseases
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review