Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 325

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Duration Based on Ischemic and Bleeding Risks After Coronary Stenting

Open access
Costa, Francesco, Van Klaveren, David, Feres, Fausto, James, Stefan, Räber, Lorenz, Pilgrim, Thomas, Hong, Myeong-Ki, Kim, Hyo-Soo, Colombo, Antonio, Steg, Philippe Gabriel, Bhatt, Deepak L., Stone, Gregg W., Windecker, Stephan, Steyerberg, Ewout W., Valgimigli, Marco·2019·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND Complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with higher ischemic risk, which can be mitigated by long-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). However, concomitant high bleeding risk (HBR) may be present, making it unclear whether short- or long-term DAPT should be prioritized. OBJECTIVES This study investigated the effects of ischemic (by PCI complexity) and bleeding (by PRECISE-DAPT [PREdicting bleeding Complications in patients undergoing stent Implantation and SubsequEnt Dual AntiPlatelet Therapy] score) risks on clinical outcomes and on the impact of DAPT duration after coronary stenting. METHODS Complex PCI was defined as ≥3 stents implanted and/or ≥3 lesions treated, bifurcation stenting and/or stent length >60 mm, and/or chronic total occlusion revascularization. Ischemic and bleeding outcomes in high (≥25) or non-high (<25) PRECISE-DAPT strata were evaluated based on randomly allocated duration of DAPT. RESULTS Among 14,963 patients from 8 randomized trials, 3,118 underwent complex PCI and experienced a higher rate of ischemic, but not bleeding, events. Long-term DAPT in non-HBR patients reduced ischemic events in both complex (absolute risk difference: -3.86%; 95% confidence interval: -7.71 to +0.06) and noncomplex PCI strata (absolute risk difference: -1.14%; 95% confidence interval: -2.26 to -0.02), but not among HBR patients, regardless of complex PCI features. The bleeding risk according to the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction scale was increased by long-term DAPT only in HBR patients, regardless of PCI complexity. CONCLUSIONS Patients who underwent complex PCI had a higher risk of ischemic events, but benefitted from long-term DAPT only if HBR features were not present. These data suggested that when concordant, bleeding, more than ischemic risk, should inform decision-making on the duration of DAPT.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.048

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Metadata

Authors
Costa, F., Van Klaveren, D., Feres, F., James, S., Räber, L., Pilgrim, T., Hong, M.-K., Kim, H.-S., Colombo, A., Steg, P. G., Bhatt, D. L., Stone, G. W., Windecker, S., Steyerberg, E. W., & Valgimigli, M.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-02
Volume
73
Issue
7
Pages
741-754
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2911481227
Cited by
325
References
37
FWCI
31.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Duration Based on Ischemic and Bleeding Risks After Coronary Stenting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.048
The paper
Costa, F., Van Klaveren, D., Feres, F., James, S., Räber, L., Pilgrim, T., Hong, M.-K., Kim, H.-S., Colombo, A., Steg, P. G., Bhatt, D. L., Stone, G. W., Windecker, S., Steyerberg, E. W., & Valgimigli, M. (2019). Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Duration Based on Ischemic and Bleeding Risks After Coronary Stenting. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.048

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.