Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 700

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pulsed Field Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Atrial Fibrillation

Open access
Reddy, Vivek Y., Neuzil, Petr, Koruth, Jacob S., Petru, Jan, Funosako, Moritoshi, Cochet, Hubert, Sediva, Lucie, Chovanec, Milan, Dukkipati, Srinivas R., Jais, Pierre·2019·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using thermal energies such as radiofrequency or cryothermy is associated with indiscriminate tissue destruction. During pulsed field ablation (PFA), subsecond electric fields create microscopic pores in cell membranes-a process called electroporation. Among cell types, cardiomyocytes have among the lowest thresholds to these fields, potentially permitting preferential myocardial ablation. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of these 2 trials was to determine whether PFA allows durable pulmonary vein (PV) isolation without damage to collateral structures. METHODS: Two trials were conducted to assess the safety and effectiveness of catheter-based PFA in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Ablation was performed using proprietary bipolar PFA waveforms: either monophasic with general anesthesia and paralytics to minimize muscle contraction, or biphasic with sedation because there was minimal muscular stimulation. No esophageal protection strategy was used. Invasive electrophysiological mapping was repeated after 3 months to assess the durability of PV isolation. RESULTS: In 81 patients, all PVs were acutely isolated by monophasic (n = 15) or biphasic (n = 66) PFA with ≤3 min elapsed delivery/patient, skin-to-skin procedure time of 92.2 ± 27.4 min, and fluoroscopy time of 13.1 ± 7.6 min. With successive waveform refinement, durability at 3 months improved from 18% to 100% of patients with all PVs isolated. Beyond 1 procedure-related pericardial tamponade, there were no additional primary adverse events over the 120-day median follow-up, including: stroke, phrenic nerve injury, PV stenosis, and esophageal injury. The 12-month Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom from arrhythmia was 87.4 ± 5.6%. CONCLUSIONS: In first-in-human trials, PFA preferentially affected myocardial tissue, allowing facile ultra-rapid PV isolation with excellent durability and chronic safety. (IMPULSE: A Safety and Feasibility Study of the IOWA Approach Endocardial Ablation System to Treat Atrial Fibrillation; NCT03700385; and PEFCAT: A Safety and Feasibility Study of the FARAPULSE Endocardial Ablation System to Treat Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation; NCT03714178).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.04.021

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 700

Metadata

Authors
Reddy, V. Y., Neuzil, P., Koruth, J. S., Petru, J., Funosako, M., Cochet, H., Sediva, L., Chovanec, M., Dukkipati, S. R., & Jais, P.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-07
Volume
74
Issue
3
Pages
315-326
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2944063628
Cited by
700
References
2
FWCI
38.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pulsed Field Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Atrial Fibrillation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.04.021
The paper
Reddy, V. Y., Neuzil, P., Koruth, J. S., Petru, J., Funosako, M., Cochet, H., Sediva, L., Chovanec, M., Dukkipati, S. R., & Jais, P. (2019). Pulsed Field Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Atrial Fibrillation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.04.021

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.