Cited by 87Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular DiseasesCoronary Interventions and DiagnosticsAcute Myocardial Infarction Research

Ticagrelor With or Without Aspirin in High-Risk Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Open access
Angiolillo, Dominick J., Baber, Usman, Sartori, Samantha, Briguori, Carlo, Dangas, George, Cohen, David J., Mehta, Shamir R., Gibson, C. Michael +17 more·2020·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Background P2Y 12 inhibitor monotherapy with ticagrelor after a brief period of dual antiplatelet therapy can reduce bleeding without increasing ischemic harm after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The impact of this approach among patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) remains unknown. Objectives The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of ticagrelor monotherapy versus ticagrelor plus aspirin among patients with DM undergoing PCI. Methods This was a pre-specified analysis of the DM cohort in the TWILIGHT (Ticagrelor With Aspirin or Alone in High-Risk Patients after Coronary Intervention) trial. After 3 months of ticagrelor plus aspirin, patients were maintained on ticagrelor and randomized to aspirin or placebo for 1 year. The primary endpoint was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 2, 3, or 5 bleeding. The composite ischemic endpoint was all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Results Patients with DM comprised 37% (n = 2,620) of the randomized cohort and were characterized by more frequent comorbidities and a higher prevalence of multivessel disease. The incidence of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 2, 3, or 5 bleeding was 4.5% and 6.7% among patients with DM randomized to ticagrelor plus placebo versus ticagrelor plus aspirin (hazard ratio: 0.65; 95% confidence interval: 0.47 to 0.91; p = 0.012). Ticagrelor monotherapy was not associated with an increase in ischemic events compared with ticagrelor plus aspirin (4.6% vs. 5.9%; hazard rat…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.03.008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Early aspirin discontinuation compared with continued dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary stenting may reduce the risk of bleeding without a corresponding increase in the risks of mortality and ischemic events, as shown in a prespecified analysis of people with diabetes enrolled in the TWILIGHT trial and a meta-analysis.

    “However, early aspirin discontinuation compared with continued dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary stenting may reduce the risk of bleeding without a corresponding increase in the risks of mortality and ischemic events, as shown in a prespecified analysis of people with diabetes enrolled in the TWILIGHT (Ticagrelor With Aspirin or Alone in High-Risk Patients After Coronary Intervention) trial”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 40 · Cited by 87

Authors
Angiolillo, D. J., Baber, U., Sartori, S., Briguori, C., Dangas, G., Cohen, D. J., Mehta, S. R., Gibson, C. M., Chandiramani, R., Huber, K., Kornowski, R., Weisz, G., Kunadian, V., Oldroyd, K. G., Ya-Ling, H., Kaul, U., Witzenbichler, B., Dudek, D., Sardella, G., Escaned, J., Sharma, S., Shlofmitz, R. A., Collier, T., Pocock, S., & Mehran, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Clinica Mediterranea (IT)
  • University of Missouri–Kansas City (US)
  • Population Health Research Institute (CA)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Sigmund Freud Privatuniversität Wien (AT)
  • Rabin Medical Center (IL)
  • Montefiore Medical Center (US)
  • Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Golden Jubilee National Hospital (GB)
  • Batra Hospital and Medical Research Centre (IN)
  • Helios Amper-Klinikum Dachau (DE)
  • Jagiellonian University (PL)
  • Policlinico Umberto I (IT)
  • Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
  • St. Francis Hospital (US)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
75
Issue
19
Pages
2403-2413
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3013912639
Cited by
87
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 19
FWCI
10.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • Homo Politicus (Academy of Humanities and Economics in Lodz) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Funders
British Heart Foundation (CS/15/7/31679)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
Keywords
ticagrelor, aspirin, dual antiplatelet therapy, ticagrelor monotherapy, diabetes mellitus, percutaneous coronary intervention, bleeding risk, ischemic events, P2Y12 inhibitors, coronary artery disease, multivessel coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, stroke, all-cause mortality, high-risk patients
MeSH terms
Ticagrelor, Aspirin, Diabetes Mellitus, Double-Blind Method, Drug Therapy, Combination, Hemorrhage, Humans, Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors, Postoperative Complications, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review