Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 283

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Type A Aortic Dissection—Experience Over 5 Decades

Open access
Zhu, Yuanjia, Lingala, Bharathi, Baiocchi, Michael, Tao, Jacqueline J., Toro Arana, Veronica, Khoo, Jason W., Williams, Kiah M., Traboulsi, Abd Al-Rahman, Hammond, Hilary C., Lee, Anson M., Hiesinger, William, Boyd, Jack, Oyer, Philip E., Stinson, Edward B., Reitz, Bruce A., Mitchell, R. Scott, Miller, D. Craig, Fischbein, Michael P., Woo, Y. Joseph·2020·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

The Stanford classification of aortic dissection was described in 1970. The classification proposed that type A aortic dissection should be surgically repaired immediately, whereas type B aortic dissection can be treated medically. Since then, diagnostic tools and management of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) have undergone substantial evolution. This paper evaluated historical changes of ATAAD repair at Stanford University since the establishment of the aortic dissection classification 50 years ago. The surgical approaches to the proximal and distal extent of the aorta, cerebral perfusion methods, and cannulation strategies were reviewed. Additional analyses using patients who underwent ATAAD repair at Stanford University from 1967 through December 2019 were performed to further illustrate the Stanford experience in the management of ATAAD. While technical complexity increased over time, post-operative survival continued to improve. Further investigation is warranted to delineate factors associated with the improved outcomes observed in this study.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.07.061

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Cited by

See all 283

Metadata

Authors
Zhu, Y., Lingala, B., Baiocchi, M., Tao, J. J., Toro Arana, V., Khoo, J. W., Williams, K. M., Traboulsi, A. A.-R., Hammond, H. C., Lee, A. M., Hiesinger, W., Boyd, J., Oyer, P. E., Stinson, E. B., Reitz, B. A., Mitchell, R. S., Miller, D. C., Fischbein, M. P., & Woo, Y. J.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-10
Volume
76
Issue
14
Pages
1703-1713
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3088097098
Cited by
283
References
36
FWCI
12.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Type A Aortic Dissection—Experience Over 5 Decades. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.07.061
The paper
Zhu, Y., Lingala, B., Baiocchi, M., Tao, J. J., Toro Arana, V., Khoo, J. W., Williams, K. M., Traboulsi, A. A.-R., Hammond, H. C., Lee, A. M., Hiesinger, W., Boyd, J., Oyer, P. E., Stinson, E. B., Reitz, B. A., Mitchell, R. S., Miller, D. C., Fischbein, M. P., & Woo, Y. J. (2020). Type A Aortic Dissection—Experience Over 5 Decades. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.07.061

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.