Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,558

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization

Open access
Lawton, Jennifer S., Tamis-Holland, Jacqueline E., Bangalore, Sripal, Bates, Eric R., Beckie, Theresa M., Bischoff, James M., Bittl, John A., Cohen, Mauricio G., DiMaio, J. Michael, Don, Creighton W., Fremes, Stephen E., Gaudino, Mario F., Goldberger, Zachary D., Grant, Michael C., Jaswal, Jang B., Kurlansky, Paul A., Mehran, Roxana, Metkus, Thomas S., Nnacheta, Lorraine C., Rao, Sunil V., Sellke, Frank W., Sharma, Garima, Yong, Celina M., Zwischenberger, Brittany A.·2022·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

AIM The guideline for coronary artery revascularization replaces the 2011 coronary artery bypass graft surgery and the 2011 and 2015 percutaneous coronary intervention guidelines, providing a patient-centric approach to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with significant coronary artery disease undergoing coronary revascularization as well as the supporting documentation to encourage their use. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 2019 to September 2019, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration, CINHL Complete, and other relevant databases. Additional relevant studies, published through May 2021, were also considered. STRUCTURE Coronary artery disease remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. Coronary revascularization is an important therapeutic option when managing patients with coronary artery disease. The 2021 coronary artery revascularization guideline provides recommendations based on contemporary evidence for the treatment of these patients. The recommendations present an evidence-based approach to managing patients with coronary artery disease who are being considered for coronary revascularization, with the intent to improve quality of care and align with patients' interests.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.09.006

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 62 references

Cited by

See all 1,558

Metadata

Authors
Lawton, J. S., Tamis-Holland, J. E., Bangalore, S., Bates, E. R., Beckie, T. M., Bischoff, J. M., Bittl, J. A., Cohen, M. G., DiMaio, J. M., Don, C. W., Fremes, S. E., Gaudino, M. F., Goldberger, Z. D., Grant, M. C., Jaswal, J. B., Kurlansky, P. A., Mehran, R., Metkus, T. S., Nnacheta, L. C., Rao, S. V., Sellke, F. W., Sharma, G., Yong, C. M., & Zwischenberger, B. A.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-01
Volume
79
Issue
2
Pages
e21-e129
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200601666
Cited by
1,558
References
62
FWCI
194.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jacc.2021.09.006
The paper
Lawton, J. S., Tamis-Holland, J. E., Bangalore, S., Bates, E. R., Beckie, T. M., Bischoff, J. M., Bittl, J. A., Cohen, M. G., DiMaio, J. M., Don, C. W., Fremes, S. E., Gaudino, M. F., Goldberger, Z. D., Grant, M. C., Jaswal, J. B., Kurlansky, P. A., Mehran, R., Metkus, T. S., Nnacheta, L. C., . . . Zwischenberger, B. A. (2022). 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2021.09.006

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.