Cited by 41

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of Semaglutide on Epicardial Adipose Tissue in Type 2 Diabetes

Manubolu, Venkat Sanjay, Lakshmanan, Suvasini, Kinninger, April, Ahmad, Khadije, Susarla, Shriraj, Seok, Hoon J., Hamal, Sajad, Dahal, Suraj, Roy, Sion K., Budoff, Matthew J.·2024·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.05.065

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In contrast with the aforementioned study of GLP-1 RA, we found no effect on epicardial fat volume.

    “In contrast with the aforementioned study of GLP-1 RA,21 we found no effect on epicardial fat volume”
  • A recent randomized study using noncontrast computed tomography in the STOP trial showed semaglutide reduced EAT by 19.3 mm3 as compared with placebo in 115 diabetic patients with known coronary artery disease.

    “A recent randomized study using noncontrast computed tomography in a prespecified secondary analysis of the STOP (Semaglutide Treatment effect On coronary atherosclerosis Progression) trial, the GLP-1 RA semaglutide was shown to reduce EAT by 19.3 mm3 as compared with placebo in 115 diabetic patients with known coronary artery disease.21”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Goeller, 2018, Epicardial adipose tissue density and volume are related to subclinical atherosclerosis, inflammation and major adverse cardiac events in asymptomatic subjects, J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr, 12, 67, 10.1016/j.jcct.2017.11.007 · DOI
  2. Eisenberg, 2020, Deep learning-based quantification of epicardial adipose tissue volume and attenuation predicts major adverse cardiovascular events in asymptomatic subjects, Circ Imaging, 13
  3. Hamal, 2020, Effect of semaglutide on coronary atherosclerosis progression in patients with type II diabetes: rationale and design of the semaglutide treatment on coronary progression trial, Coron Artery Dis, 31, 306, 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000830 · DOI
  4. Iacobellis, 2020, Effects of semaglutide versus dulaglutide on epicardial fat thickness in subjects with type 2 diabetes and obesity, J Endocr Soc, 4

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Manubolu, V. S., Lakshmanan, S., Kinninger, A., Ahmad, K., Susarla, S., Seok, H. J., Hamal, S., Dahal, S., Roy, S. K., & Budoff, M. J.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-08
Volume
84
Issue
9
Pages
865-867
ISSN
0735-1097
Cited by
41
References
1
Language
en
Funders
  • New Netherland Institute
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Novo Nordisk AS

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review