Cited by 49Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementChronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesDiabetes Treatment and Management

Interplay of Chronic Kidney Disease and the Effects of Tirzepatide in Patients With Heart Failure, Preserved Ejection Fraction, and Obesity

Open access
Packer, Milton, Zile, Michael R., Kramer, Christopher M., Murakami, Masahiro, Ou, Yang, Borlaug, Barry A.·2025·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

BackgroundObesity leads to both heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and to chronic kidney disease (CKD); CKD may both influence the clinical course of obesity-related HFpEF; and incretin-based drugs may influence renal function. ObjectivesThis analysis had dual objectives: 1) to evaluate the influence of CKD on the clinical responses to tirzepatide in patients with obesity-related HFpEF; and 2) to investigate the complexity of tirzepatide-related changes in renal function. For both objectives, we focused on discrepancies between creatinine-based and cystatin C–based estimates of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). MethodsThe SUMMIT trial randomly assigned 731 patients with HFpEF and a body mass index ≥30 kg/m2, who were enriched for participants with CKD. Patients received either placebo or tirzepatide for a median of 104 weeks and were followed for cardiovascular death or worsening heart failure events and for changes in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score (KCCQ-CSS) after 52 weeks. Because of the confounding produced by obesity and changes in muscle mass, eGFR was assessed at randomization and after 12, 24, and 52 weeks by both creatinine-based and cystatin C–based formulae. ResultsPatients with CKD (based on creatinine or cystatin C) had greater severity of heart failure, as reflected by: 1) worse functional class, KCCQ-CSS scores, and 6-minute walk distance; 2) higher levels of NT-proBNP and cardiac troponin T; and 3) a 2-fold increase in the risk of worsening heart failure events. CKD did not influence the effect of tirzepatide to reduce the relative risk of major adverse heart failure events and to improve KCCQ-CSS, quality of life, and functional capacity, but the absolute risk reduction in the primary events was numerically greater in patients with CKD. Regarding renal function assessments, baseline eGFR-cystatin C was consistently ≈9 mL/min/1.73 m2 lower than that eGFR-creatinine, with significant individual variance. Furthermore, tirzepatide increased eGFR at 52 weeks, assessed by both creatinine-based and cystatin C–based formulae, but with considerable discordance in individual patients. Tirzepatide produced a decline in eGFR at 12 weeks with eGFR-creatinine (but not eGFR-cystatin C), and it led to an improvement in eGFR at 52 weeks in all patients (when assessed by cystatin C), but only in patients with CKD (when assessed by eGFR-creatinine). ConclusionsThe triad of obesity, HFpEF, and CKD identifies patients with considerable functional impairment and an unfavorable prognosis, who nevertheless respond favorably to tirzepatide. Long-term tirzepatide improves renal function (both by cystatin C and creatinine), but the measurement of eGFR in patients with obesity receiving incretin-based drugs is likely to be skewed by the effects of fat and muscle mass (and by changes in body composition) on the synthesis of both cystatin C and creatinine. (A Study of Tirzepatide [LY3298176] in Participants With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction [HFpEF] and Obesity: The SUMMIT Trial; NCT04847557)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2025.03.009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Similar benefits for kidney function were shown in subjects with heart failure.

    “Regarding co-agonist treatment, tirzepatide was recently shown in a post hoc analysis of the SURMOUNT-1 trial to also reduce UACR in overweight/obese people without T2D (88), and similar benefits for kidney function were shown in subjects with heart failure (89).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 90 · Cited by 49

Authors
Packer, M., Zile, M. R., Kramer, C. M., Murakami, M., Ou, Y., & Borlaug, B. A.
Affiliations
  • Baylor University Medical Center (US)
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
  • University of Virginia Health System (US)
  • Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Packer, Milton
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-05
Volume
85
Issue
18
Pages
1721-1735
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4409086666
Cited by
49
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 21
FWCI
34.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eli Lilly and Co
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
tirzepatide, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, obesity, chronic kidney disease, estimated glomerular filtration rate, cystatin C, creatinine-based eGFR, renal function, incretin-based drugs, SUMMIT trial, worsening heart failure, quality of life, NT-proBNP, cardiac troponin T, functional capacity, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire
MeSH terms
Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors, Tirzepatide, Aged, Female, Glomerular Filtration Rate, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Stroke Volume, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic, Cystatin C

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review