Atrial Fibrillation and Stress
Open accessAbstract
The accumulating literature linking stress with negative health outcomes, including cardiovascular disease (CVD), is extensively reported yet poorly defined. Stress is associated with a higher risk of hypertension, acute myocardial infarction, arrhythmogenesis, and heart failure. Stress mediates its effect through direct neuronal, endocrine, autonomic, and immune processes and indirectly by modifying lifestyle behaviors that promote CVD progression. Stress occurs when an individual perceives that internal or external demands exceed the capacity for an adaptive response. Psychologic stress is increasingly recognized in the atrial fibrillation (AF) population, although the pathophysiology remains unclear. There appears to be a bidirectional relationship between AF and stress with a complex interplay between the 2 entities. Stress modulates the immune and autonomic nervous systems, key drivers in AF initiation and potentiation. AF leads to increasing anxiety, psychologic distress, and suicidal ideation. Recently, lifestyle modification has emerged as the fourth pillar of AF management, with stress reduction a potential reversible risk factor and future target for intervention. This review examines proposed mechanisms linking AF and stress and explores stress reduction as an adjunct to the AF management armamentarium.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Anxiety and psychological stress are highly prevalent among people with AF, affecting 25% to 45% of patients, and are associated with greater symptom burden, higher rates of health care utilization, and worse quality of life.
“Anxiety and psychological stress are also highly prevalent among people with AF, affecting 25% to 45% of patients, 11 , 12 , 13 and are associated with greater symptom burden, higher rates of health care utilization, and worse quality of life.”
From Wearable Devices, Health Care Use, and Psychological Well-Being in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation (2024) · cites this paper as [12]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 81 · Cited by 39
- Authors
- Segan, L., Prabhu, S., Kalman, J. M., & Kistler, P. M.
- Affiliations
- Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute (AU)
- The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU)
- Venue
- JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-08
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1051-1059
- ISSN
- 2405-500X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4213424254
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 81
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 1.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- JACC. Clinical electrophysiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Medtronic
- Biosense Webster
- Abbott Laboratories
- National Hospice Foundation
- National Health and Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
- Keywords
- atrial fibrillation, psychological stress, stress reduction, cardiovascular risk, autonomic nervous system, immune system, anxiety, psychological distress, suicidal ideation, lifestyle modification, arrhythmogenesis, stress reduction intervention
- MeSH terms
- Atrial Fibrillation, Autonomic Nervous System, Heart Failure, Humans, Risk Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review