Systemic responsiveness to lipopolysaccharide and polymorphisms in the toll-like receptor 4 gene in human beings
Open accessAbstract
Background The response to lipopolysaccharide exposure is highly variable and might be a result of genetic diversity between individuals. The toll-like receptor 4 (TLR-4) is the principal receptor for lipopolysacharide.Objectives We investigated the association between single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the TLR4 locus and levels of systemic inflammatory markers in response to lipopolysaccharide.Methods Healthy subjects (n = 116) were genotyped for the most frequent polymorphisms found in the promoter and coding region of the TLR4 gene (-2026A/T, -1607T/C, +896A/G, and +1196C/T relative to the translation start site). Subjects were challenged with 20 microg lipopolysaccharide by inhalation.Results Polymorphisms at +896 and +1196 were in complete linkage disequilibrium, and no homozygotes for the less common allele, G and T respectively, were found. After lipopolysaccharide inhalation, subjects heterozygous for either TLR-4/+896 or TLR4/+1196 had significantly lower numbers of white blood cell counts and lower levels of C-reactive protein and lipopolysaccharide-binding protein compared with homozygotes with the common allele. None of the heterozygous subjects (n = 18) except 1 were high responders to lipopolysaccharide (defined as a rise in C-reactive protein > 10 mg/L), whereas 36 of 98 homozygous subjects were high responders (P <.02). No association was observed between the TLR-4/-2026 and TLR-4/-1607 polymorphisms and lipopolysaccharide responsiveness.Conclusion The single-nucleotide polymorphisms at position +896 or +1196 in the TLR-4 gene is associated with systemic inflammatory hyporesponsiveness to inhaled lipopolysaccharide.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Variants of TLR4 can predispose individuals to sepsis, as evidenced by increased markers of systemic inflammation, including C-reactive protein (CRP), LPS-binding protein, and peripheral leukocytes in healthy humans exposed to endotoxin.
“Variants of TLR4, the principal receptor for lipopolysaccharide (LPS), can predispose individuals to sepsis, as evidenced by increased markers of systemic inflammation, including C-reactive protein (CRP), LPS-binding protein, and peripheral leukocytes in healthy humans exposed to endotoxin (99).”
From Into the Eye of the Cytokine Storm (2012) · cites this paper as [99]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 51 · Cited by 147
- Authors
- Michel, O., LeVan, T. D., Stern, D., Dentener, M., Thorn, J., Gnat, D., Beijer, M. L., Cochaux, P., Holt, P. G., Martinez, F. D., & Rylander, R.
- Affiliations
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Pierre (BE)
- University of Arizona (US)
- Maastricht University (NL)
- University of Gothenburg (SE)
- Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
- The Kids Research Institute Australia (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Michel, Olivier
- Venue
- Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-11
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 923-929
- ISSN
- 0091-6749 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1981839489
- Cited by
- 147
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 4.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5k01es000386-05, 5r01hl061892-04)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL61892-01)
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (ES00386)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Inflammasome and immune disorders
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Keywords
- TLR4, TLR4 polymorphisms, lipopolysaccharide, C-reactive protein, lipopolysaccharide-binding protein, white blood cell count, linkage disequilibrium
- MeSH terms
- Lipopolysaccharide-Binding Protein, Acute-Phase Proteins, Administration, Inhalation, Adult, Alleles, C-Reactive Protein, Carrier Proteins, Heterozygote, Homozygote, Humans, Inflammation, Leukocyte Count, Lipopolysaccharides, Membrane Glycoproteins, Middle Aged, Receptors, Cell Surface, Linkage Disequilibrium, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Toll-Like Receptors, Toll-Like Receptor 4
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review