Fungal fragments and undocumented conidia function as new aeroallergen sources
Open accessAbstract
Background More than 100 genera of fungal conidia are currently recognized as sources of allergens. The contribution of other fungal genera plus airborne fungal hyphae and fragmented conidia to allergic diseases is poorly understood.Objective We sought to investigate the expression of allergens from airborne wild-type fungi using the Halogen immunoassay, which uses allergic serum IgE to immunostain immobilized allergens extracted from individual fungal particles.Methods Airborne fungi were collected onto mixed cellulose ester protein-binding membranes for 2.5 hours with volumetric air pumps. Collected fungi were incubated overnight in a humid chamber to promote the germination of conidia. The membranes were laminated with an adhesive cover slip and immunostained with an Alternaria species-sensitive serum IgE pool. The samples were examined by means of light microscopy, and positively immunostained fungal particles were classified and counted.Results All air samples contained fungal hyphae that expressed soluble allergens and were significantly higher in concentration than counts of conidia of individual well-characterized allergenic genera (P < .05). Resultant immunostaining of fungal hyphae was heterogeneous, and approximately 25% of all hyphae expressed detectable allergen compared with nonstained hyphae (P < .05). Fungal conidia of 10 genera that were previously uncharacterized as allergen sources were shown to demonstrate IgE binding to expressed antigens and accounted for 8% of the total airborne conidia count.Conclusions Our analysis of wild-type fungi collected indoors presents a new paradigm of natural fungal exposure, which, in addition to commonly recognized species, implicates airborne hyphae, fragmented conidia, and the conidia of a much more diverse range of genera as airborne allergens.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Exposure to fungi occurs also through sub-micrometer fungal fragments.
“Recent studies have shown that exposure to fungi occurs also through sub-micrometer fungal fragments (Foto et al. 2005; Gorny et al. 2002; Green et al. 2005).”
From Mold and Endotoxin Levels in the Aftermath of Hurricane Katrina: A Pilot Project of Homes in New Orleans Undergoing Renovation (2006) · cites this paper as Green et al. 2005
The Discussion (page unavailable) says airborne fungal hyphae and fragmented conidia contribute to personal exposure to fungal allergens. It does not establish exposure through sub-micrometer fragments: it says particles smaller than 2.5 µm could not be accurately identified and that smaller allergen-containing fragments might have gone undetected. (LLM, conf=0.89)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredFungal fragments and hyphae are potential allergens.
“Fungal fragments and hyphae are potential allergens (Green et al., 2005).”
From Size-selective Assessment of Respirator Protection against Airborne Fungi and (1→3)-β-D-glucan in Farms (2018) · cites this paper as Green et al., 2005
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 16 · Cited by 148
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Paul GC, Kent CA, Thomas CR. Hyphal vacuolation and fragmentation in Penicillium-chrysogenum. Biotechnol Bioeng 1994;44:655-60.
- Authors
- Green, B. J., Sercombe, J. K., & Tovey, E. R.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Woolcock Institute of Medical Research (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Green, Brett James
- ORCID
- Tovey, Euan Roger
- Venue
- Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-05
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1043-1048
- ISSN
- 0091-6749 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2093039089
- Cited by
- 148
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 6.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Sydney
- Medical Research Council
- National Health and Medical Research Council (253818)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
- Keywords
- airborne fungi, fungal allergens, fungal conidia, fungal hyphae, aeroallergens, indoor fungal exposure, IgE binding, Alternaria, conidial germination, allergic diseases
- MeSH terms
- Air, Allergens, Alternaria, Antibody Specificity, Environmental Exposure, Fungi, Halogens, Immunoglobulin E, Immunoassay, Species Specificity, Hyphae
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review