Cited by 255Indoor Air Quality and Microbial ExposureAsthma and respiratory diseasesOccupational exposure and asthma

Exposure to Alternaria alternata in US homes is associated with asthma symptoms

Open access
Salo, Päivi M., Arbes, Samuel J., Sever, Michelle, Jaramillo, Renee, Cohn, Richard D., London, Stephanie J., Zeldin, Darryl C.·2006·Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

Abstract

Background Exposure to the fungus Alternaria alternata is a risk factor for asthma. Few studies have examined Alternaria exposures in indoor environments.Objective We examined whether exposure to A alternata in US homes was associated with asthma-related outcomes.Methods The data for this study were collected as part of the National Survey of Lead and Allergens in Housing. This cross-sectional study surveyed a nationally representative sample of 831 housing units inhabited by 2456 individuals in 75 different locations throughout the United States. An interviewer-administered questionnaire obtained information on demographics, household characteristics, and occupants' health status. Exposure to A alternata was assessed by measuring concentrations of A alternata antigens in vacuumed dust samples using a polyclonal anti-A alternata antibody assay. Dust samples were collected from a bed, a sofa, or a chair, and from bedroom, living room, and kitchen floors.Results Lifetime prevalence of doctor-diagnosed asthma was 11.2%, and 6.9% of the study subjects reported active asthma symptoms in the past 12 months. The prevalence of current symptomatic asthma increased with increasing Alternaria concentrations in US homes; higher levels of A alternata antigens increased the odds of having asthma symptoms in the past year (relative to the lowest tertile, adjusted odds ratio was 1.52, 95% CI, 0.90-2.55 for the 2nd tertile; and 1.84, 95% CI, 1.18-2.85 for the 3rd tertile).Conclusion Exposure to A alternata in US homes is associated with active asthma symptoms.Clinical implications Measures that reduce indoor exposure to A alternata may help control asthma exacerbations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.07.037

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is substantial evidence that indoor allergens generated by house dust mite, mold and cat are triggers for both childhood and adult asthma, especially in those sensitized.

    “There is substantial evidence to suggest that indoor allergens generated by house dust mite, mold and cat are triggers for both childhood and adult asthma, especially in those sensitized (100–102).”

    From Epidemiology of Asthma in Children and Adults (2019) · cites this paper as [100]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 255

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Committee on the assessment of asthma and indoor air. Indoor Biologic Exposures. In: Clearing the air: asthma and indoor exposures. Washing- ton (DC): National Academy Press; 2000. p. 105-222.
  2. Chapman MD, Vailes LD, Ichikawa K. Immunoassays for indoor aller- gens. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2000;18:285-300.

Authors
Salo, P. M., Arbes, S. J., Sever, M., Jaramillo, R., Cohn, R. D., London, S. J., & Zeldin, D. C.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Zeldin, Darryl C.
Venue
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-10
Volume
118
Issue
4
Pages
892-898
ISSN
0091-6749 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2123532192
Cited by
255
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 17
FWCI
11.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (Z01ES025041)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational exposure and asthma
Keywords
Alternaria alternata, indoor fungal exposure, asthma symptoms, indoor air quality, house dust, fungal allergens, asthma prevalence, indoor allergens, asthma exacerbation prevention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Alternaria, Antigens, Fungal, Asthma, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dust, Environmental Exposure, Female, Housing, Humans, Male, Prevalence, Air Pollution, Indoor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review