Allergy-related outcomes in relation to serum IgE: Results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005-2006
Open accessAbstract
Background The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005-2006 was the first population-based study to investigate levels of serum total and allergen-specific IgE in the general US population.Objective We estimated the prevalence of allergy-related outcomes and examined relationships between serum IgE levels and these outcomes in a representative sample of the US population.Methods Data for this cross-sectional analysis were obtained from NHANES 2005-2006. Study subjects aged 6 years and older (n = 8086) had blood taken for measurement of total IgE and 19 specific IgE levels against common aeroallergens, including Alternaria alternata, Aspergillus fumigatus, Bermuda grass, birch, oak, ragweed, Russian thistle, rye grass, cat dander, cockroach, dog dander, dust mite (Dermatophagoides farinae and Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus), mouse and rat urine proteins, and selected foods (egg white, cow's milk, peanut, and shrimp). Serum samples were analyzed for total and allergen-specific IgE by using the Pharmacia CAP System. Information on allergy-related outcomes and demographics was collected by questionnaire.Results In NHANES 2005-2006, 6.6% reported current hay fever, and 23.5% had current allergies. Allergy-related outcomes increased with increasing total IgE levels (adjusted odds ratios for a 10-fold increase in total IgE level of 1.86 [95% CI, 1.44-2.41] for hay fever and 1.64 [95% CI, 1.41-1.91] for allergies). Increased levels of plant-, pet-, and mold-specific IgE contributed independently to allergy-related symptoms. The greatest increase in odds was observed for hay fever and plant-specific IgE (adjusted odds ratio, 4.75; 95% CI, 3.83-5.88).Conclusion In the US population self-reported allergy symptoms are most consistently associated with increased levels of plant-, pet-, and mold-specific IgE.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Total IgE levels are significantly associated with current hay fever in different age classes.
“Salo et al.454 performed a cross-sectional study reporting significant associations between tIgE levels and current hay fever in different age classes.”
From International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (2018) · cites this paper as [454]
The Results report a statistically significant association between total IgE and current hay fever (adjusted OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.44–2.41) and say that Table II presents age-stratified odds ratios. The available Results passage does not establish that the association was statistically significant in each age class; its explicit age-group comparison concerns current allergies, not hay fever. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.79)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 45 · Cited by 234
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [2]Bloom B Cohen RA Summary health statistics for U.S. children: National Health Interview Survey, 2006 Vital Health Stat 2007 10 234 17969822
- [3]Bloom B Dey AN Freeman G Summary health statistics for U.S. children: National Health Interview Survey, 2005 Vital Health Stat 2006 10 231 17201200
- Authors
- Salo, P. M., Calatroni, A., Gergen, P. J., Hoppin, J. A., Sever, M. L., Jaramillo, R., Arbes, S. J., & Zeldin, D. C.
- Affiliations
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (US)
- Rho (United States) (US)
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- SRA International (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zeldin, Darryl C.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-05
- Volume
- 127
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1226-1235.e7
- ISSN
- 0091-6749 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3108140
- OpenAlex
- W2044126861
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 10.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
- Keywords
- serum IgE, specific IgE, allergy prevalence, allergic rhinitis, allergic symptoms, plant allergens, pet allergens, mold allergens, dust mites, food allergy, total IgE
- MeSH terms
- Allergens, Animals, Antibody Specificity, Cats, Cattle, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dogs, Female, Fungi, Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal, Humans, Hypersensitivity, Immediate, Immunoglobulin E, Male, Nutrition Surveys, Plants, Surveys and Questionnaires, United States, Prevalence, Mice, Rats, Pets
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review