Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 395

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 147 of the 147 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Asthma outcomes: Biomarkers

Open access
Szefler, Stanley J., Wenzel, Sally, Brown, Robert, Erzurum, Serpil C., Fahy, John V., Hamilton, Robert G., Hunt, John F., Kita, Hirohito, Liu, Andrew H., Panettieri, Reynold A., Schleimer, Robert P., Minnicozzi, Michael·2012·Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

Abstract

Background Measurement of biomarkers has been incorporated within clinical research studies of asthma to characterize the population and associate the disease with environmental and therapeutic effects. Objective National Institutes of Health institutes and federal agencies convened an expert group to propose which biomarkers should be assessed as standardized asthma outcomes in future clinical research studies. Methods We conducted a comprehensive search of the literature to identify studies that developed and/or tested asthma biomarkers. We identified biomarkers relevant to the underlying disease process progression and response to treatment. We classified the biomarkers as either core (required in future studies), supplemental (used according to study aims and standardized), or emerging (requiring validation and standardization). This work was discussed at an National Institutes of Health–organized workshop convened in March 2010 and finalized in September 2011. Results Ten measures were identified; only 1, multiallergen screening to define atopy, is recommended as a core asthma outcome. Complete blood counts to measure total eosinophils, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (Feno), sputum eosinophils, urinary leukotrienes, and total and allergen-specific IgE are recommended as supplemental measures. Measurement of sputum polymorphonuclear leukocytes and other analytes, cortisol measures, airway imaging, breath markers, and system-wide studies (eg, genomics, proteomics) are considered as emerging outcome measures. Conclusion The working group participants propose the use of multiallergen screening in all asthma clinical trials to characterize study populations with respect to atopic status. Blood, sputum, and urine specimens should be stored in biobanks, and standard procedures should be developed to harmonize sample collection for clinical trial biorepositories.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.12.979

Cites

147 of 147 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 147 references

Cited by

See all 395

Metadata

Authors
Szefler, S. J., Wenzel, S., Brown, R., Erzurum, S. C., Fahy, J. V., Hamilton, R. G., Hunt, J. F., Kita, H., Liu, A. H., Panettieri, R. A., Schleimer, R. P., & Minnicozzi, M.
Venue
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-03
Volume
129
Issue
3
Pages
S9-S23
ISSN
0091-6749 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1999039702
Cited by
395
References
147
FWCI
23.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Asthma outcomes: Biomarkers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jaci.2011.12.979
The paper
Szefler, S. J., Wenzel, S., Brown, R., Erzurum, S. C., Fahy, J. V., Hamilton, R. G., Hunt, J. F., Kita, H., Liu, A. H., Panettieri, R. A., Schleimer, R. P., & Minnicozzi, M. (2012). Asthma outcomes: Biomarkers. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2011.12.979

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.