Cited by 744Sinusitis and nasal conditionsAsthma and respiratory diseasesAllergic Rhinitis and Sensitization

Omalizumab is effective in allergic and nonallergic patients with nasal polyps and asthma

Gevaert, Philippe, Calus, Lien, Van Zele, Thibaut, Blomme, Katrien, De Ruyck, Natalie, Bauters, Wouter, Hellings, Peter, Brusselle, Guy +3 more·2013·Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

Abstract

Background Adult patients with nasal polyps often have comorbid asthma, adding to the serious effect on the quality of life of these patients. Nasal polyps and asthma might represent a therapeutic challenge; inflammation in both diseases shares many features, such as airway eosinophilia, local IgE formation, and a T(H)2 cytokine profile. Omalizumab is a human anti-IgE mAb with proved efficacy in patients with severe allergic asthma. Omalizumab could be a treatment option for patients with nasal polyps and asthma. Objective The goal of this study was to investigate the clinical efficacy of omalizumab in patients with nasal polyps and comorbid asthma. Methods A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of allergic and nonallergic patients with nasal polyps and comorbid asthma (n = 24) was conducted. Subjects received 4 to 8 (subcutaneous) doses of omalizumab (n = 16) or placebo (n = 8). The primary end point was reduction in total nasal endoscopic polyp scores after 16 weeks. Secondary end points included a change in sinus computed tomographic scans, nasal and asthma symptoms, results of validated questionnaires (Short-Form Health Questionnaire, 31-item Rhinosinusitis Outcome Measuring Instrument, and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire), and serum/nasal secretion biomarker levels. Results There was a significant decrease in total nasal endoscopic polyp scores after 16 weeks in the omalizumab-treated group (-2.67, P = .001), which was confirmed by means of computed to…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.07.047

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Biological treatments have a potentially major effect on nasal obstruction and the size of nasal polyps in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.

    “These biological treatments have a potentially major effect on NO and the size of NP.”

    From Position Paper on Nasal Obstruction: Evaluation and Treatment (2018) · cites this paper as [180]

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 43 · Cited by 744

Authors
Gevaert, P., Calus, L., Van Zele, T., Blomme, K., De Ruyck, N., Bauters, W., Hellings, P., Brusselle, G., De Bacquer, D., van Cauwenberge, P., & Bachert, C.
Affiliations
  • Ghent University Hospital (BE)
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Gevaert, Philippe
Venue
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-01
Volume
131
Issue
1
Pages
110-116.e1
ISSN
0091-6749 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2105880697
Cited by
744
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 82 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 73 · 2016: 58 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 7
FWCI
34.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Sinusitis and nasal conditions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
Keywords
omalizumab, nasal polyps, asthma, allergic rhinitis, anti-IgE therapy, airway eosinophilia, quality of life, sinusitis, polyp recurrence
MeSH terms
Omalizumab, Adult, Antibodies, Anti-Idiotypic, Asthma, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nasal Polyps, Treatment Outcome, Anti-Allergic Agents, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review