Cited by 162Allergic Rhinitis and SensitizationFood Allergy and Anaphylaxis ResearchAsthma and respiratory diseases

Sensitization to cat and dog allergen molecules in childhood and prediction of symptoms of cat and dog allergy in adolescence: A BAMSE/MeDALL study

Open access
Asarnoj, Anna, Hamsten, Carl, Wadén, Konrad, Lupinek, Christian, Andersson, Niklas, Kull, Inger, Curin, Mirela, Anto, Josep +4 more·2016·Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

Abstract

Background Sensitization to individual cat and dog allergen molecules can contribute differently to development of allergy to these animals.Objective We sought to investigate the association between sensitization patterns to cat and dog allergen molecules during childhood and symptoms to these furry animals up to age 16 years.Methods Data from 779 randomly collected children from the Barn/Children Allergy/Asthma Milieu Stockholm Epidemiologic birth cohort at 4, 8, and 16 years were used. IgE levels to cat and dog were determined by using ImmunoCAP, and levels to allergen molecules were determined by using an allergen chip based on ISAC technology (Mechanisms for the Development of Allergy chip). Allergy was defined as reported rhinitis, conjunctivitis, or asthma at exposure to cat or dog.Results Cross-sectionally, IgE to Fel d 1 and cat extract had similar positive predictive values for cat allergy. IgE to Can f 1 showed a higher positive predictive value for dog allergy than dog extract IgE. Sensitizations to Fel d 1 and Can f 1 in childhood were significantly associated with symptoms to cat or dog at age 16 years. Polysensitization to 3 or more allergen molecules from cat or dog was a better longitudinal predictor of cat or dog symptoms than results of IgE tests with cat or dog allergen extract, respectively. Cross-sectionally, cat/dog-polysensitized children had higher IgE levels and more frequent symptoms to cat and dog than monosensitized children.Conclusions Sensitization to Fel d 1 and Can f 1 in childhood and polysensitization to either cat or dog allergen molecules predict cat and dog allergy cross-sectionally and longitudinally significantly better than IgE to cat or dog extract.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.09.052

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Measuring sensitization to individual allergen molecules in component resolved diagnosis may be more informative than standard tests using whole-allergen extracts.

    “Measuring sensitization to individual allergen molecules in a CRD may more be informative than standard tests using whole-allergen extracts.470,1014-1016”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 27 · Cited by 162

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Nivenius E Van der Ploeg I Gafvelin G Van Hage M Montan PG Conjunctival provocation with airborne allergen in patients with atopic keratoconjunctivitis Clin Exp Allergy 2012 42 58 65 22092652

Authors
Asarnoj, A., Hamsten, C., Wadén, K., Lupinek, C., Andersson, N., Kull, I., Curin, M., Anto, J., Bousquet, J., Valenta, R., Wickman, M., & van Hage, M.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
  • Medical University of Vienna (AT)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier (FR)
Corresponding author
Asarnoj, Anna
Venue
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-03
Volume
137
Issue
3
Pages
813-821.e7
ISSN
0091-6749 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2194143275
Cited by
162
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 11
FWCI
14.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • AstraZeneca
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Sanofi
  • Teva Pharmaceutical Industries
  • European Commission (261357)
  • Austrian Science Fund (F4605, 261357)
  • Universität Wien
  • Hjärt-Lungfonden
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • Stockholms Läns Landsting
  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • Medizinische Universität Wien
  • Magnus Bergvalls Stiftelse (F4605)
  • Svenska Läkaresällskapet
  • Astma- och Allergiförbundet
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
Keywords
cat allergy, canine allergy, allergen sensitization, Fel d 1, Can f 1, polysensitization, allergen extracts, IgE, pediatric allergy, allergy prediction, rhinitis, conjunctivitis, asthma
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Age Factors, Allergens, Animals, Antibody Specificity, Cats, Child, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dogs, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Hypersensitivity, Immunoglobulin E, Immunization, Prognosis, Odds Ratio, Public Health Surveillance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review