Sensitization to cat and dog allergen molecules in childhood and prediction of symptoms of cat and dog allergy in adolescence: A BAMSE/MeDALL study
Open accessAbstract
Background Sensitization to individual cat and dog allergen molecules can contribute differently to development of allergy to these animals.Objective We sought to investigate the association between sensitization patterns to cat and dog allergen molecules during childhood and symptoms to these furry animals up to age 16 years.Methods Data from 779 randomly collected children from the Barn/Children Allergy/Asthma Milieu Stockholm Epidemiologic birth cohort at 4, 8, and 16 years were used. IgE levels to cat and dog were determined by using ImmunoCAP, and levels to allergen molecules were determined by using an allergen chip based on ISAC technology (Mechanisms for the Development of Allergy chip). Allergy was defined as reported rhinitis, conjunctivitis, or asthma at exposure to cat or dog.Results Cross-sectionally, IgE to Fel d 1 and cat extract had similar positive predictive values for cat allergy. IgE to Can f 1 showed a higher positive predictive value for dog allergy than dog extract IgE. Sensitizations to Fel d 1 and Can f 1 in childhood were significantly associated with symptoms to cat or dog at age 16 years. Polysensitization to 3 or more allergen molecules from cat or dog was a better longitudinal predictor of cat or dog symptoms than results of IgE tests with cat or dog allergen extract, respectively. Cross-sectionally, cat/dog-polysensitized children had higher IgE levels and more frequent symptoms to cat and dog than monosensitized children.Conclusions Sensitization to Fel d 1 and Can f 1 in childhood and polysensitization to either cat or dog allergen molecules predict cat and dog allergy cross-sectionally and longitudinally significantly better than IgE to cat or dog extract.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Measuring sensitization to individual allergen molecules in component resolved diagnosis may be more informative than standard tests using whole-allergen extracts.
“Measuring sensitization to individual allergen molecules in a CRD may more be informative than standard tests using whole-allergen extracts.470,1014-1016”
From International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (2018) · cites this paper as [1016]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27 · Cited by 162
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Nivenius E Van der Ploeg I Gafvelin G Van Hage M Montan PG Conjunctival provocation with airborne allergen in patients with atopic keratoconjunctivitis Clin Exp Allergy 2012 42 58 65 22092652
- Authors
- Asarnoj, A., Hamsten, C., Wadén, K., Lupinek, C., Andersson, N., Kull, I., Curin, M., Anto, J., Bousquet, J., Valenta, R., Wickman, M., & van Hage, M.
- Affiliations
- Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
- Medical University of Vienna (AT)
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Asarnoj, Anna
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-03
- Volume
- 137
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 813-821.e7
- ISSN
- 0091-6749 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6597346
- OpenAlex
- W2194143275
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 11
- FWCI
- 14.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- AstraZeneca
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Sanofi
- Teva Pharmaceutical Industries
- European Commission (261357)
- Austrian Science Fund (F4605, 261357)
- Universität Wien
- Hjärt-Lungfonden
- Karolinska Institutet
- Stockholms Läns Landsting
- Vetenskapsrådet
- Medizinische Universität Wien
- Magnus Bergvalls Stiftelse (F4605)
- Svenska Läkaresällskapet
- Astma- och Allergiförbundet
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
- Keywords
- cat allergy, canine allergy, allergen sensitization, Fel d 1, Can f 1, polysensitization, allergen extracts, IgE, pediatric allergy, allergy prediction, rhinitis, conjunctivitis, asthma
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Age Factors, Allergens, Animals, Antibody Specificity, Cats, Child, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dogs, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Hypersensitivity, Immunoglobulin E, Immunization, Prognosis, Odds Ratio, Public Health Surveillance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review