The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The United States’ reckoning with racism during the COVID-19 pandemic: What can we learn and do as allergist-immunologists?
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A spotlight on structural inequities and resultant health disparities, laid bare by the COVID-19 pandemic, has pushed physician advocacy to the forefront of national conversation.
“Since this initial review 5 years ago, a spotlight on structural inequities and resultant health disparities, laid bare by the COVID-19 pandemic, has pushed physician advocacy to the forefront of national conversation35–37, and many programs have published their GME advocacy curricula, sharing creative solutions to barriers as well as lessons learned in curricular implementation.”
From Advocacy Curricula in Graduate Medical Education: an Updated Systematic Review from 2017 to 2022 (2023) · cites this paper as [37]
The opening section (page unavailable) says the pandemic magnified racial health disparities and, alongside systemic racial injustice, propelled racism to the forefront of national conversation. The paper urges allergist-immunologists to advocate for change, but it does not say physician advocacy itself came to the forefront of that conversation. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Galea, 2020, COVID-19 pandemic, unemployment, and civil unrest: underlying deep racial and socioeconomic divides, JAMA, 324, 227, 10.1001/jama.2020.11132 · DOI · Paper page
- Bailey, 2017, Structural racism and health inequities in the USA: evidence and interventions, Lancet, 389, 1453, 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30569-X · DOI · Paper page
- Nardone, 2020, Associations between historical residential redlining and current age-adjusted rates of emergency department visits due to asthma across eight cities in California: an ecological study, Lancet Planet Health, 4, e24, 10.1016/S2542-5196(19)30241-4 · DOI
- Coogan, 2014, Experiences of racism and the incidence of adult-onset asthma in the Black Women’s Health Study, Chest, 145, 480, 10.1378/chest.13-0665 · DOI
- Thakur, 2017, Perceived discrimination associated with asthma and outcomes in minority youth: the GALA II and SAGE II studies, Chest, 151, 804, 10.1016/j.chest.2016.11.027 · DOI
- Lucas, 2017, Perceived discrimination, racial identity, and multisystem stress response to social evaluative threat among African American men and women, Psychosom Med, 79, 293, 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000406 · DOI
- Wright, 2012, Stress-related programming of autonomic imbalance: role in allergy and asthma, Chem Immunol Allergy, 98, 32, 10.1159/000336496 · DOI
- Rodriguez, 2020, Digital health equity as a necessity in the 21st Century Cures Act era, JAMA, 323, 2381, 10.1001/jama.2020.7858 · DOI
- Bryant-Stephens, 2016, Home visits are needed to address asthma health disparities in adults, J Allergy Clin Immunol, 138, 1526, 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.10.006 · DOI
- Gray, 2020, How academia should respond to racism, Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 17, 589, 10.1038/s41575-020-0349-x · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Advocacy Curricula in Graduate Medical Education: an Updated Systematic Review from 2017 to 2022
Agrawal, N., Lucier, J., Ogawa, R., & Arons, A. (2023) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-023-08244-x · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Wright, L. S., Louisias, M., & Phipatanakul, W.
- Affiliations
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Boston Children's Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Phipatanakul, Wanda
- Venue
- Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-02
- Volume
- 147
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 504-506
- ISSN
- 0091-6749 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8754393
- OpenAlex
- W3096987404
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (K24 AI 106822)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (L30 HL143781)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare Systems and Challenges
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
- Keywords
- racism, COVID-19 pandemic, racial disparities in health, asthma, African Americans, health equity
- MeSH terms
- Allergists, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Humans, United States, Health Status Disparities, Healthcare Disparities, Pandemics, Racism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
