Medical nutrition therapy is the essential cornerstone for effective treatment of “refractory” severe hypertriglyceridemia regardless of pharmaceutical treatment: Evidence from a Lipid Management Program
Abstract
Background Patients with refractory severe hypertriglyceridemia are at risk of pancreatitis and cardiovascular disease. The role of individualized nutrition therapy in these patients independent of pharmaceutical treatment has not been documented. Objective To document the effect of nutrition intervention on severe hypertriglyceridemia regardless of medication status or prior nutrition counseling. Methods Outcomes of new patients with triglycerides ≥ 500 mg/dL presenting to a Lipid Management Program over a 6-year period were tracked. Patients received comprehensive laboratory assessment, nutrition assessment, and initiation of an individualized diet intervention before seeing the lipidologist. Clinical and behavioral outcomes were recorded. Results In all, 168 patients (117 men; mean age, 49.03 ± 11.22 years; body mass index, 32.61 ± 5.85 kg/m(2); 110 (65.5%) on lipid-lowering medications) returned for assessment of nutrition intervention. Triglycerides were reduced from median (interquartile range) 961.5 (611.5-1785.3) to 493.0 (337-736.3) mg/dL (P Conclusions Individualized nutrition therapy results in changes in eating behavior and reductions in triglyceride levels in patients with refractory severe hypertriglyceridemia independent of lipid-lowering medication(s) and prior nutrition counseling.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a study of an individualized lifestyle intervention in patients with elevated triglycerides, there was a 48% reduction (IQR −73 to −23; P<0.0001) in triglyceride levels regardless of the patient's lipid-lowering medications.
“In a study that evaluated the effect of an individualized lifestyle intervention (the percent of calories from fat varied) in patients with elevated triglycerides, there was a 48% reduction (interquartile range: −73 to −23; P < 0.0001) in triglyceride levels regardless of the patient’s lipid-lowering medications (57).”
From 2021 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on the Management of ASCVD Risk Reduction in Patients With Persistent Hypertriglyceridemia (2021) · cites this paper as [57]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 32 · Cited by 25
- Authors
- Rhodes, K. S., Weintraub, M., Marchlewicz, E. H., Rubenfire, M., & Brook, R. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rhodes, Katherine S.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Lipidology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-07
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 559-567
- ISSN
- 1876-4789 (ISSN-L)
- 1933-2874
- OpenAlex
- W1992804586
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 1.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of clinical lipidology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipid metabolism and disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Keywords
- severe hypertriglyceridemia, medical nutrition therapy, triglyceride lowering, lipid-lowering drugs, dietary fat intake, dietary habits, pancreatitis risk, cardiovascular risk
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Hypolipidemic Agents, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cholesterol, Female, Humans, Cholesterol, HDL, Male, Middle Aged, Pancreatitis, Risk Factors, Triglycerides, Hypertriglyceridemia, Body Mass Index, Treatment Outcome, Nutrition Therapy, Fibric Acids
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review