Polygenic risk score predicts prevalence of cardiovascular disease in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia
Abstract
Background Although familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a severe monogenic disease, it has been shown that clinical risk factors and common genetic variants can modify cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Objective The aim of the study was to evaluate the polygenic contribution to lipid traits and CVD in FH using genetic risk scores (GRSs). Methods Among the 20,434 subjects attending the lipid clinic, we identified and included 725 individuals who carried an FH causing mutation in this retrospective cohort study. We evaluated the association of GRSs for several traits including coronary artery disease (CAD; GRS CAD ) as well as plasma concentrations of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C; GRS LDL-C ), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (GRS HDL-C ) and triglycerides (GRS TG ). Results A total of 32% (n = 231) of FH subjects presented a CVD event before their first visit. Patients in the highest GRS LDL-C tertile presented an LDL-C 0.4 mmol/L (15.5 mg/dL) higher than the subjects in the lowest tertile (P = .01). The GRS CAD was strongly associated with CVD events (odds ratio 1.80; 95% confidence interval 1.14-2.85; P = .01) even after adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors. Compared with subjects in the first tertile, those in the third GRS CAD tertile had a significantly higher prevalence of events (40.9% vs 24.7%, P Conclusion These results indicate that even in the context of a severe monogenic disease such as FH, common genetic variants can significantly modif…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Integrated models of PRS together with other lifestyle and clinical factors have enabled clinicians to more accurately quantify the risk of heart attack.
“Additionally, integrated models of PRS together with other lifestyle and clinical factors have enabled clinicians to more accurately quantify the risk of heart attack for patients;”
From Clinical use of current polygenic risk scores may exacerbate health disparities (2019) · cites this paper as [8]
Polygenic scores have contributed new approaches to risk prediction for adverse phenotypes related to heart disease.
“For example, they have contributed new approaches to risk prediction for adverse phenotypes related to heart disease [21–23].”
From Interpreting polygenic scores, polygenic adaptation, and human phenotypic differences (2019) · cites this paper as [22]
Cites
Biological insights from 108 schizophrenia-associated genetic loci
Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13595 · Cited by 7,577 · see citing works
Common polygenic variation contributes to risk of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder
The International Schizophrenia Consortium (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08185 · Cited by 4,821 · see citing works
A comprehensive 1000 Genomes–based genome-wide association meta-analysis of coronary artery disease
the CARDIoGRAMplusC4D Consortium (2015) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3396 · Cited by 2,447 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Clinical use of current polygenic risk scores may exacerbate health disparities
Martin, A. R., Kanai, M., Kamatani, Y., Okada, Y., Neale, B. M., & Daly, M. J. (2019) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-019-0379-x · Cited by 2,831 · see citing works
Genetics of hypertriglyceridemia
Dron, J. S., & Hegele, R. A. (2020) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2020.00455 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Interpreting polygenic scores, polygenic adaptation, and human phenotypic differences
Rosenberg, N. A., Edge, M. D., Pritchard, J. K., & Feldman, M. W. (2019) · Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health · doi:10.1093/emph/eoy036 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
“For example, they have contributed new approaches to risk prediction for adverse phenotypes related to heart disease [21-23].”
Current clinical use of polygenic scores will risk exacerbating health disparities
Martin, A. R., Kanai, M., Kamatani, Y., Okada, Y., Neale, B. M., & Daly, M. J. (2018) · doi:10.1101/441261 · Cited by 2,813 · see citing works
- Authors
- Paquette, M., Chong, M., Thériault, S., Dufour, R., Paré, G., & Baass, A.
- Affiliations
- Montreal Clinical Research Institute (CA)
- Hamilton General Hospital (CA)
- Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Baass, Alexis
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Lipidology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-05
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 725-732.e5
- ISSN
- 1876-4789 (ISSN-L)
- 1933-2874
- OpenAlex
- W2604231946
- Cited by
- 115
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 14.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of clinical lipidology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Fondation Leducq (13CVD03)
- Amgen
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Keywords
- familial hypercholesterolemia, polygenic risk score, cardiovascular disease, coronary artery disease, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, lipid traits, common genetic variants, cardiovascular risk prediction, lipid clinic patients
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Cardiovascular Diseases, Female, Humans, Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II, Lipids, Male, Phenotype, Risk Factors, Genetic Variation, Prevalence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review