Cited by 72Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthCholesterol and Lipid MetabolismLipid metabolism and disorders

Complementary low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol lowering and pharmacokinetics of adding bempedoic acid (ETC-1002) to high-dose atorvastatin background therapy in hypercholesterolemic patients: A randomized placebo-controlled trial

Lalwani, Narendra D., Hanselman, Jeffrey C., MacDougall, Diane E., Sterling, Lulu R., Cramer, Clay T.·2019·Journal of Clinical Lipidology

Abstract

Background Bempedoic acid is an oral, once-daily, first-in-class medication being developed to treat hypercholesterolemia. Objective The aim of the study was to assess the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)-lowering efficacy of bempedoic acid added to stable high-intensity atorvastatin background therapy and multiple-dose plasma pharmacokinetics of atorvastatin alone and combined with steady-state bempedoic acid. Methods This was a phase 2 study in patients with hypercholesterolemia (NCT02659397). Patients received once-daily open-label atorvastatin 80 mg for 4 weeks then were randomized 2:1 at baseline to receive double-blind bempedoic acid 180 mg (n = 45) or placebo (n = 23) plus open-label atorvastatin 80 mg for 4 weeks. Efficacy was assessed 4 weeks after randomization. Atorvastatin and metabolites' steady-state levels were analyzed before first dosing with bempedoic acid and after 2 weeks of treatment. Results The 4-week stabilization phase with 80 mg atorvastatin resulted in approximately 40% lowering of LDL-C values from screening. The placebo-adjusted least squares mean lowering of LDL-C from baseline to Day 29 with bempedoic acid was 22% (P = .003). Placebo-adjusted reductions from baseline with bempedoic acid also were significant for total cholesterol (-10%; P = .014), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-13%; P = .015), apolipoprotein B (-15%; P = .004), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (-44%; P = .002). Point estimates of bempedoic acid effe…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacl.2019.05.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 22 · Cited by 72

Authors
Lalwani, N. D., Hanselman, J. C., MacDougall, D. E., Sterling, L. R., & Cramer, C. T.
Affiliations
Esperion Therapeutics (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Lalwani, Narendra D.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Lipidology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-07
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
568-579
ISSN
  • 1876-4789 (ISSN-L)
  • 1933-2874
OpenAlex
W2945722781
Cited by
72
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 1
FWCI
9.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of clinical lipidology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Esperion Therapeutics
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipid metabolism and disorders
Keywords
bempedoic acid, atorvastatin, hypercholesterolemia, LDL cholesterol lowering, combination lipid-lowering therapy, apolipoprotein B, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, statin safety, drug-drug interactions
MeSH terms
Atorvastatin, Aged, Anticholesteremic Agents, Apolipoproteins B, C-Reactive Protein, Dicarboxylic Acids, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Fatty Acids, Half-Life, Humans, Hypercholesterolemia, Cholesterol, LDL, Male, Middle Aged, Placebo Effect, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review