Cited by 34Lipid metabolism and disordersLymphatic Disorders and TreatmentsMetabolism and Genetic Disorders

Chylomicronemia syndrome: Familial or not?

Warden, Bruce A., Minnier, Jessica, Duell, P. Barton, Fazio, Sergio, Shapiro, Michael D.·2020·Journal of Clinical Lipidology

Abstract

Background Chylomicronemia syndrome (CS) is a metabolic condition characterized by severely elevated plasma triglycerides (>880 mg/dL) and high rates of morbidity and mortality. The syndrome can be classified into two major groups: monogenic familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS) and multifactorial chylomicronemia syndrome (MCS), the frequencies of which are ill-defined. Objective The objective of the study was to characterize the prevalence of the most common and rarest subsets of this syndrome, MCS and FCS, respectively, in a single-center, real-world setting. Methods This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of patients with plasma triglycerides ≥880 mg/dL. The criteria used for identification of patients with FCS were modeled after a Food and Drug Administration endorsed set of parameters. Less stringent criteria that removed the requirement for pancreatitis were used to classify MCS. Full criteria are described in detail in the article. Results Of the 2,342,136 patient records queried, 578 had triglycerides ≥880 mg/dL (0.025%), of which 86 had a documented history of pancreatitis. Five patients who met the criteria for FCS were identified (three genetically confirmed), resulting in an estimated prevalence of ~1-2 per 1,000,000. On the other hand, MCS was identified in 186 patients, corresponding to an estimated prevalence of ~1 in 12,000. There were 5181 cases of pancreatitis (0.22% of the entire cohort), 86 of which occurred in subjects with triglycerides≥880 mg/d…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacl.2020.01.014

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multifactorial chylomicronemia syndrome has been shown to be 40- to 60-fold more prevalent than autosomal recessive familial chylomicronemia syndrome and familial partial lipodystrophy.

    “Indeed, multifactorial chylomicronemia syndrome has been shown to be 40- to 60-fold more prevalent than 2 other monogenic conditions: autosomal recessive familial chylomicronemia syndrome and familial partial lipodystrophy, that predispose people to severe elevation of triglycerides (43).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Warden, B. A., Minnier, J., Duell, P. B., Fazio, S., & Shapiro, M. D.
Affiliations
Oregon Health & Science University (US)
Corresponding author
Shapiro, Michael D.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Lipidology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
201-206
ISSN
  • 1876-4789 (ISSN-L)
  • 1933-2874
OpenAlex
W3003935115
Cited by
34
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4
FWCI
3.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of clinical lipidology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Oregon Health and Science University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipid metabolism and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lymphatic Disorders and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
Keywords
chylomicronemia syndrome, familial chylomicronemia syndrome, hypertriglyceridemia, plasma triglycerides, pancreatitis, prevalence, secondary hypertriglyceridemia, disease classification
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Hyperlipoproteinemia Type I, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Triglycerides, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review