Cited by 12Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthLipid metabolism and disordersDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Importance of the triglyceride level in identifying patients with a Type III Hyperlipoproteinemia phenotype using the ApoB algorithm

Varghese, Bibin, Park, Jihwan, Chew, Erin, Sajja, Aparna, Brownstein, Adam, Pallazola, Vincent A., Sathiyakumar, Vasanth, Jones, Steven R. +2 more·2021·Journal of Clinical Lipidology

Abstract

Background Hyperlipoproteinemia Type III (HLP3), also known as dysbetalipoproteinemia, is defined by cholesterol and triglyceride (TG) enriched remnant lipoprotein particles (RLP). The gold standard for diagnosis requires demonstration of high remnant lipoprotein particle cholesterol (RLP-C) by serum ultracentrifugation (UC), which is not readily available in daily practice. The apoB algorithm can identify HLP3 using total cholesterol (TC), plasma triglyceride (TG), and apoB. However, the optimal TG cutoff is unknown. Objective We analyzed apoB algorithm defined HLP3 at different TG levels to optimize the TG cutoff for the algorithm. Methods 128,485 UC lipid profiles in the Very Large Database of Lipids (VLDbL) were analyzed. RLP-C was assessed at TG ≥ 133 mg/dL, ≥175 mg/dL, ≥200 mg/dL, and ≥ 250 mg/dL. Sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and prevalence adjusted and bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK) were calculated against UC Criterion (VLDL-C/TG ≥ 0.25) for HLP3. Results The median age (IQR) was 57 years (46-68). 45% were men, 20.1% had diabetes, and 25.5% had hypertension. The median RLP-C level for the TG cutoffs (mg/dL) of ≥ 133, ≥ 175, ≥ 200, and ≥ 250 were 34, 43, 50, and 62 mg/dL, respectively, compared to 67 mg/dL in UC defined HLP3. TG ≥ 133 mg/dL yielded optimal results (Sn 29.5%, Sp 98.5%, PABAK 0.96, PPV 13.6%, NPV 99.4%). Conclusion TG ≥ 133 mg/dL allows for high sensitivity in screening for HLP3. Higher…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacl.2020.09.011

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Varghese, B., Park, J., Chew, E., Sajja, A., Brownstein, A., Pallazola, V. A., Sathiyakumar, V., Jones, S. R., Sniderman, A. D., & Martin, S. S.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • McGill University Health Centre (CA)
Corresponding author
Martin, Seth S.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Lipidology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
104-115.e9
ISSN
  • 1876-4789 (ISSN-L)
  • 1933-2874
OpenAlex
W3094458672
Cited by
12
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of clinical lipidology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Novo Nordisk
  • American Heart Association
  • Strålsäkerhetsmyndigheten
  • Sanofi
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Aetna Foundation
  • Quest Diagnostics
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipid metabolism and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
type III hyperlipoproteinemia, dysbetalipoproteinemia, remnant cholesterol, sensitivity and specificity, triglyceride levels
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Algorithms, Apolipoproteins B, Female, Humans, Hyperlipoproteinemia Type III, Male, Middle Aged, Phenotype, Triglycerides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review