Reporting significant unexpected findings: The emergence of information technology solutions
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Achieving high standards of patient safety through the use of IT also entails system redesign to include formal policies and procedures regarding the use of IT.
“Thus, achieving high standards of patient safety through the use of IT also entails system redesign to include formal policies and procedures regarding the use of IT.43–47”
From Reducing Diagnostic Errors through Effective Communication: Harnessing the Power of Information Technology (2008) · cites this paper as [43]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 16
- Authors
- Brantley, S. D., & Brantley, R. D.
- Corresponding author
- Brantley, Ryan Douglas
- Venue
- Journal of the American College of Radiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-04
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 304-307
- ISSN
- 1546-1440 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2040014257
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American College of Radiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiology practices and education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- incidental finding, radiology reporting, reporting policies, IT solutions, communication of findings, reporting consistency, radiology practice management
- MeSH terms
- Communication, Communication Barriers, Communications Media, Humans, Radiology, Radiology Information Systems, Incidental Findings
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
