Malpractice Liability Risk and Use of Diagnostic Imaging Services: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Abstract
Purpose A widespread concern among physicians is that fear of medical malpractice liability may affect their decisions for diagnostic imaging orders. The purpose of this article is to synthesize evidence regarding the defensive use of imaging services. Methods A literature search was conducted using a number of databases. The review included peer-reviewed publications that studied the link between physician orders of imaging tests and malpractice liability pressure. Results We identified 13 peer-reviewed studies conducted in the United States. Five of the studies reported physician assessments of the role of defensive medicine in imaging-order decisions; five assessed the association between physicians' liability risk and imaging ordering, and three assessed the impact of liability risk on imaging ordering at the state level. Although the belief that medical liability risk could influence decisions is highly prevalent among physicians, findings are mixed regarding the impact of liability risk on imaging orders at both the state and physician level. Conclusions Inconclusive evidence suggests that physician ordering of imaging tests is affected by malpractice liability risk. Further research is needed to disentangle defensive medicine from other reasons for inefficient use of imaging.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Clinicians' decision making can be greatly impacted by the potential medical liability risk, which often leads to selecting defensive practices, such as ordering unnecessary tests and referrals, that are perceived as mitigating malpractice claim risk instead of clinically necessary actions to avoid legal issues.
“Clinicians’ decision making can be greatly impacted by the potential medical liability risk, which often leads to selecting defensive practices, such as ordering unnecessary tests and referrals, that are perceived as mitigating malpractice claim risk instead of clinically necessary actions to avoid legal issues [262,263,264].”
From Toward Safer Diagnoses: A SEIPS-Based Narrative Review of Diagnostic Errors (2026) · cites this paper as [264]
Cites
National Costs Of The Medical Liability System
Mello, M. M., Chandra, A., Gawande, A. A., & Studdert, D. M. (2010) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0807 · Cited by 498 · see citing works
Malpractice Liability and Defensive Medicine: A National Survey of Neurosurgeons
Nahed, B. V., Babu, M. A., Smith, T. R., & Heary, R. F. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0039237 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Toward Safer Diagnoses: A SEIPS-Based Narrative Review of Diagnostic Errors
Yen, C., Epling, J. W., Rockwell, M., & Vaughn-Cooke, M. (2026) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics16020347 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Li, S., & Brantley, E.
- Affiliations
- George Washington University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Li, Suhui
- Venue
- Journal of the American College of Radiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-12
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1403-1412
- ISSN
- 1546-1440 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2181289271
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 0.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American College of Radiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare cost, quality, practices
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiology practices and education
- Keywords
- defensive medicine, medical malpractice liability, diagnostic imaging, physician behavior, liability risk, overuse of imaging
- MeSH terms
- Diagnostic Imaging, Malpractice, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Radiology, Referral and Consultation, United States, Utilization Review, Liability, Legal, Risk Assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review