ACR Appropriateness Criteria® malignant or aggressive primary musculoskeletal tumor—Staging and surveillance: 2022 update
Abstract
Malignant or aggressive primary musculoskeletal tumors are rare and encompass a wide variety of bone and soft tissue tumors. Given the most common site for metastasis from these primary musculoskeletal tumors is to the lung, chest imaging is integral in both staging and surveillance. Extrapulmonary metastases are rarely encountered with only a few exceptions. Following primary tumor resection, surveillance of the primary tumor site is generally recommended. Local surveillance imaging recommendations differ between primary tumors of bone origin versus soft tissue origin. This document consolidates the current evidence and expert opinion for the imaging staging and surveillance of these tumors into five clinical scenarios. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer-reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances in which peer-reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In postoperative and post-treatment settings, radiologic interpretation may be complicated by fibrosis, necrosis, inflammation, postsurgical change, and stable residual abnormalities that do not reliably distinguish treatment effect from viable disease.
“In the postoperative and post-treatment setting, radiologic interpretation may be further complicated by fibrosis, necrosis, inflammation, postsurgical change, and stable residual abnormalities that do not reliably distinguish treatment effect from viable disease [ 6 , 7 , 8 ].”
From Signals Alongside Scans: A Genomics-Guided Framework for Liquid Biopsy in Bone and Soft-Tissue Sarcomas (2026) · cites this paper as [7]
Imaging and clinicopathologic assessment mainly capture anatomic disease rather than real-time molecular activity.
“however, they mainly capture anatomic disease rather than real-time molecular activity [ 6 , 7 , 8 ].”
From Signals Alongside Scans: A Genomics-Guided Framework for Liquid Biopsy in Bone and Soft-Tissue Sarcomas (2026) · cites this paper as [7]
Current sarcoma surveillance remains centered on imaging and clinicopathologic assessment.
“Current sarcoma surveillance remains centered on imaging and clinicopathologic assessment.”
From Signals Alongside Scans: A Genomics-Guided Framework for Liquid Biopsy in Bone and Soft-Tissue Sarcomas (2026) · cites this paper as [7]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 81 · Cited by 17
- Authors
- Stanborough, R., Demertzis, J. L., Wessell, D. E., Lenchik, L., Ahlawat, S., Baker, J. C., Banks, J., Caracciolo, J. T., Garner, H. W., Hentz, C., Lewis, V. O., Lu, Y., Maynard, J. R., Pierce, J. L., Scott, J. A., Sharma, A., & Beaman, F. D.
- Affiliations
- Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
- Wake Forest University (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
- University of South Florida (US)
- Loyola University Chicago (US)
- American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (US)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- University of Virginia (US)
- SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University (US)
- University of Kentucky (US)
- Corresponding author
- Demertzis, Jennifer L.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of the American College of Radiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-11
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- S374-S389
- ISSN
- 1546-1440 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4310071454
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 81
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 1.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American College of Radiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
- Keywords
- bone tumors, soft tissue tumor, tumor staging, post-treatment surveillance, lung metastasis, chest imaging, primary tumor resection, appropriateness of imaging
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Neoplasm Staging, Societies, Medical, Soft Tissue Neoplasms, Evidence-Based Medicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review