Strategies for managing antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction: systematic review of randomised controlled trials
Abstract
Background This review was undertaken to assess the effectiveness of management strategies for sexual dysfunction caused by antidepressant medication. Methods Electronic databases and reference lists were searched, and pharmaceutical companies and experts contacted to identify randomised controlled trials comparing management strategies for antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction. Results Fifteen trials involving 904 people were included. One trial involving 75 people with sexual dysfunction due to sertraline assessed changing antidepressant. Switching to nefazodone was significantly less likely to result in the re-emergence of sexual dysfunction than restarting sertraline (RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.6). Meta-analysis of two trials involving 113 men with erectile dysfunction found that the addition of sildenafil resulted in less sexual dysfunction at endpoint on rating scales including the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) (WMD 19.36, 95% CI 15.00 to 23.72). Another trial found the addition of bupropion led to improved scores on the Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire desire-frequency subscale (WMD 0.88, 95% CI 0.21 to 1.55). In a further study the addition of tadalafil was associated with greater improvement in the erectile function domain of the IIEF than placebo (WMD 8.10; 95% CI 4.62 to 11.68). Other augmentation strategies failed to show statistically significant improvements in sexual dysfunction compared with placebo. Discussion The currently available evidence is rather limited, with small numbers of trials assessing each strategy. However, while further randomised data is awaited, for men with antidepressant-induced erectile dysfunction, the addition of sildenafil appears to be an effective strategy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The largest gaps in life expectancy for people with severe mental illness are observed in low-income settings.
“Indeed, the largest gaps in life expectancy for people with SMI are observed in low-income settings.47,314”
From The Lancet Psychiatry Commission: a blueprint for protecting physical health in people with mental illness (2019) · cites this paper as [314]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 45 · Cited by 102
- Authors
- Taylor, M. J., Rudkin, L., & Hawton, K.
- Affiliations
- Warneford Hospital (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Taylor, Matthew J.
- ORCID
- Taylor, Matthew J.
- Venue
- Journal of Affective Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 241-254
- ISSN
- 0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2091776609
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Pfizer
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Keywords
- antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction, erectile dysfunction, antidepressant switching, nefazodone, sertraline, sildenafil, bupropion, tadalafil
- MeSH terms
- Sildenafil Citrate, Antidepressive Agents, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Piperazines, Placebos, Purines, Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological, Sulfones, Vasodilator Agents, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review