Cited by 102Sexual function and dysfunction studiesSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyTreatment of Major Depression

Strategies for managing antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction: systematic review of randomised controlled trials

Taylor, Matthew J., Rudkin, Lisa, Hawton, Keith·2005·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background This review was undertaken to assess the effectiveness of management strategies for sexual dysfunction caused by antidepressant medication. Methods Electronic databases and reference lists were searched, and pharmaceutical companies and experts contacted to identify randomised controlled trials comparing management strategies for antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction. Results Fifteen trials involving 904 people were included. One trial involving 75 people with sexual dysfunction due to sertraline assessed changing antidepressant. Switching to nefazodone was significantly less likely to result in the re-emergence of sexual dysfunction than restarting sertraline (RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.6). Meta-analysis of two trials involving 113 men with erectile dysfunction found that the addition of sildenafil resulted in less sexual dysfunction at endpoint on rating scales including the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) (WMD 19.36, 95% CI 15.00 to 23.72). Another trial found the addition of bupropion led to improved scores on the Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire desire-frequency subscale (WMD 0.88, 95% CI 0.21 to 1.55). In a further study the addition of tadalafil was associated with greater improvement in the erectile function domain of the IIEF than placebo (WMD 8.10; 95% CI 4.62 to 11.68). Other augmentation strategies failed to show statistically significant improvements in sexual dysfunction compared with placebo. Discussion The currently available evidence is rather limited, with small numbers of trials assessing each strategy. However, while further randomised data is awaited, for men with antidepressant-induced erectile dysfunction, the addition of sildenafil appears to be an effective strategy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2005.07.006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 102

Authors
Taylor, M. J., Rudkin, L., & Hawton, K.
Affiliations
Warneford Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Taylor, Matthew J.
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-11
Volume
88
Issue
3
Pages
241-254
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2091776609
Cited by
102
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Pfizer
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction, erectile dysfunction, antidepressant switching, nefazodone, sertraline, sildenafil, bupropion, tadalafil
MeSH terms
Sildenafil Citrate, Antidepressive Agents, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Piperazines, Placebos, Purines, Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological, Sulfones, Vasodilator Agents, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review