Cited by 110Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchSleep and related disorders

Delayed-onset PTSD: A prospective study of injury survivors

Carty, Jessica, O'Donnell, Meaghan L., Creamer, Mark·2006·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Recent studies have indicated that delayed-onset posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (i.e., the development of PTSD more than 6 months posttrauma) is generally characterised by subsyndromal diagnoses within the first 6 months. This study sought to examine the relationship between sub-clinical levels of PTSD symptoms at 3 months posttrauma and delayed onset PTSD at 12 months in a large sample of traumatic injury survivors.Methods Three hundred and one consecutively admitted injury survivors were assessed at 3 and 12 months posttrauma. PTSD was diagnosed according to DSM-IV criteria, while partial and subsyndromal diagnoses were based on recent definitions developed by Mylle and Maes [Mylle, J., Maes, M., 2004. Partial posttraumatic stress disorder revisited. J. Affect. Disord. 78, 37-48].Results Eight percent of participants was diagnosed with 3-month PTSD while 10% was diagnosed with 12-month PTSD. Nearly half (47%) of 12-month PTSD cases were of delayed onset. The majority of those with delayed-onset were diagnosed with partial or subsyndromal PTSD at 3 months. Ten percent of delayed onset cases did not meet partial or subsyndromal criteria.Limitations As symptoms were not assessed at 6 months (the DSM cut-off for delayed PTSD), it could not be conclusively determined that delayed-onset cases had not developed PTSD between 3 and 6 months posttrauma.Conclusion A considerable proportion of 12-month PTSD diagnoses was delayed in onset. While most demonstrated 3-month morbidity in the form of partial and subsyndromal diagnoses, a minority did not. Thus, clinicians should consider subthreshold diagnoses as potential risk factors for delayed-onset PTSD. Future research is required to identify factors that may predict delayed-onset PTSD in trauma survivors without evidence of prior PTSD pathology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2005.11.011

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 21 · Cited by 110

Authors
Carty, J., O'Donnell, M. L., & Creamer, M.
Affiliations
  • Mental Health Australia (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
O'Donnell, Meaghan L.
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-02
Volume
90
Issue
2-3
Pages
257-261
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1973942860
Cited by
110
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale
  • Alfred Trauma Service
  • National Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, subsyndromal PTSD, PTSD risk factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Admission, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Wounds and Injuries, Injury Severity Score, Survivors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review