The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cross-cultural and social diversity of prevalence of postpartum depression and depressive symptoms
Abstract
Background The prevalence of postpartum depression (PPD) is currently considered to be 10-15%. Most studies were performed with a brief unidimensional instruments (mostly the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale-EPDS) with focus on depression and not on other symptoms and disorders. Most cited studies were conducted in Western economically developed countries.Methods We reviewed the literature on prevalence of postpartum depression and depressive symptoms in a wide range of countries.Results 143 studies were identified reporting prevalence in 40 countries. It is demonstrated that there is a wide range of reported prevalence of PPD ranging from almost 0% to almost 60%. In some countries like Singapore, Malta, Malaysia, Austria and Denmark there are very few reports of PPD or postpartum depressive symptoms, whereas in other countries (e.g. Brazil, Guyana, Costa Rica, Italy, Chile, South Africa, Taiwan and Korea) reported postpartum depressive symptoms are very prevalent.Conclusions We believe that the widely cited mean prevalence of PPD-10-15% is not representative of the actual global prevalence and magnitude of the problem, due to the wide range of reports. The variability in reported PPD might be due to cross-cultural variables, reporting style, differences in perception of mental health and its stigma, differences in socio-economic environments (e.g. poverty, levels of social support or its perception, nutrition, stress), and biological vulnerability factors. The elucidation of the underlying processes of this variability as well as the diversity of postpartum normal versus abnormal expressions of symptoms may contribute to better understanding of the diversified ante, peri- and postpartum phenomena.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The prevalence of maternal depression therefore depends on the definition and/or the tool used to diagnose PPD.3,6–8”
From Consequences of maternal postpartum depression: A systematic review of maternal and infant outcomes (2019) · cites this paper as [7]
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Williams, J. B. W., & First, M. B. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.104 · Cited by 109,845
Detection of Postnatal Depression: Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale
Cox, J. L., Holden, J. M., & Sagovsky, R. (1987) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.150.6.782 · Cited by 14,183
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Siegel, L. J., & Fletcher‐Janzen, E. (2008) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470373699.speced0655 · Cited by 8,467
Rates and risk of postpartum depression – a meta-analysis
O'hara, M. W., & Swain, A. M. (1996) · International Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.3109/09540269609037816 · Cited by 3,116
Predictors of Postpartum Depression
Beck, C. T. (2001) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-200109000-00004 · Cited by 1,960
Murray, L., Fiori-Cowley, A., Hooper, R., & Cooper, P. (1996) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1131637 · Cited by 1,311
Murray, L., Fiori-Cowley, A., Hooper, R., & Cooper, P. (1996) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01871.x · Cited by 1,302
Gaynes, B. N., Gavin, N., Meltzer-Brody, S., Lohr, K. N., Swinson, T., Gartlehner, G., Brody, S., & Miller, W. C. (2005) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e439372005-001 · Cited by 1,211
The Impact of Postnatal Depression on Infant Development
Murray, L. (1992) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1992.tb00890.x · Cited by 1,089
Gender, Poverty, and Postnatal Depression: A Study of Mothers in Goa, India
Patel, V., Rodrigues, M., & DeSouza, N. (2002) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.159.1.43 · Cited by 774
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Gaynes, 2005, Perinatal depression: prevalence, screening accuracy, and screening outcomes, Evid. Rep./Technol. Assess. (Report), 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Grote, N. K., Bridge, J. A., Gavin, A. R., Melville, J. L., Iyengar, S., & Katon, W. J. (2010) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.111 · Cited by 1,882
Fisher, J., Cabral de Mello, M., Patel, V., Rahman, A., Tran, T., Holton, S., & Holmes, W. (2012) · Bulletin of the World Health Organization · doi:10.2471/blt.11.091850 · Cited by 1,798
Consequences of maternal postpartum depression: A systematic review of maternal and infant outcomes
Slomian, J., Honvo, G., Emonts, P., Reginster, J.-Y., & Bruyère, O. (2019) · Women's Health · doi:10.1177/1745506519844044 · Cited by 1,496
Breastfeeding and maternal health outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Chowdhury, R., Sinha, B., Sankar, M. J., Taneja, S., Bhandari, N., Rollins, N., Bahl, R., & Martines, J. (2015) · Acta Paediatrica · doi:10.1111/apa.13102 · Cited by 1,143
Mapping global prevalence of depression among postpartum women
Wang, Z., Liu, J., Shuai, H., Cai, Z., Fu, X., Liu, Y., Xiao, X., Zhang, W., Krabbendam, E., Liu, S., et al. (2021) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-021-01663-6 · Cited by 910
Metadata
- Authors
- Halbreich, U., & Karkun, S.
- Affiliations
- University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
- Corresponding author
- Halbreich, Uriel
- ORCID
- Halbreich, Uriel
- Venue
- Journal of Affective Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-04
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 97-111
- ISSN
- 0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2127916329
- Cited by
- 776
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 37
- FWCI
- 2.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Keywords
- postpartum depression, depressive symptoms, prevalence, cross-cultural variation, social diversity, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, mental health stigma, social support, socioeconomic factors, biological vulnerability
- MeSH terms
- Cross-Cultural Comparison, Depression, Female, Humans, Social Behavior, Prevalence, Cultural Diversity, Depression, Postpartum
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review