An empirical test of a mediation model of the impact of the traditional male gender role on suicidal behavior in men
Abstract
Background Men die by suicide three to four times more often than women in Western countries. The adverse impact of the traditional male gender role as well as men's reluctance to seek help are possible explanations of this gender gap, but these hypotheses have not been well documented empirically.Methods This study compares two groups of men who experienced comparable severely stressful life events during the preceding 12 months: 40 men admitted to hospital emergency following suicide attempts, and 40 men with no history of suicide attempts. Structured interviews were conducted to measure adherence to the traditional male gender role, help seeking behaviour, social support, suicide acceptability and mental health.Results ANOVAS indicated that attempters are more likely to adhere to the traditional masculine gender role and regression analysis revealed that this relationship persists even when the presence of mental disorders is statistically controlled. Sequential regression analysis support the mediation model and show that the effects of the traditional male gender role on suicidal behavior are mediated through protective and risk factors for suicide, namely mental state, help seeking and social support.Conclusions The traditional male gender role appears to increase the risk of suicidal behavior in men by undermining their mental state and by inhibiting the protective factors of help seeking and social support. This study underscores the importance of encouraging men to seek help.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some quantitative studies have found positive associations between adherence to masculine norms and suicidal thoughts and behaviours in males from the general population and from particular at-risk groups.
“Some quantitative studies have found positive associations between adherence to masculine norms and suicidal thoughts and behaviours in males from the general population [14,15,2] and from particular at-risk groups [16].”
From Masculinity and suicidal thinking (2017) · cites this paper as [2]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 124
- Authors
- Houle, J., Mishara, B. L., & Chagnon, F.
- Affiliations
- Université du Québec à Montréal (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Houle, Janie
- Venue
- Journal of Affective Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-04
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 1-3
- Pages
- 37-43
- ISSN
- 0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2039191735
- Cited by
- 124
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 2.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
- Keywords
- male gender roles, suicidal behavior, men, suicide attempts, help-seeking, social support, mental health, mediation model, protective factors, risk factors
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Attitude, Mental Disorders, Gender Identity, Health Status, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Probability, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Role, Sex Factors, Social Support, Suicide, Suicide, Attempted, Models, Statistical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review