Cited by 124Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesGender Roles and Identity StudiesLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy

An empirical test of a mediation model of the impact of the traditional male gender role on suicidal behavior in men

Houle, Janie, Mishara, Brian L., Chagnon, François·2008·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Men die by suicide three to four times more often than women in Western countries. The adverse impact of the traditional male gender role as well as men's reluctance to seek help are possible explanations of this gender gap, but these hypotheses have not been well documented empirically.Methods This study compares two groups of men who experienced comparable severely stressful life events during the preceding 12 months: 40 men admitted to hospital emergency following suicide attempts, and 40 men with no history of suicide attempts. Structured interviews were conducted to measure adherence to the traditional male gender role, help seeking behaviour, social support, suicide acceptability and mental health.Results ANOVAS indicated that attempters are more likely to adhere to the traditional masculine gender role and regression analysis revealed that this relationship persists even when the presence of mental disorders is statistically controlled. Sequential regression analysis support the mediation model and show that the effects of the traditional male gender role on suicidal behavior are mediated through protective and risk factors for suicide, namely mental state, help seeking and social support.Conclusions The traditional male gender role appears to increase the risk of suicidal behavior in men by undermining their mental state and by inhibiting the protective factors of help seeking and social support. This study underscores the importance of encouraging men to seek help.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2007.07.016

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some quantitative studies have found positive associations between adherence to masculine norms and suicidal thoughts and behaviours in males from the general population and from particular at-risk groups.

    “Some quantitative studies have found positive associations between adherence to masculine norms and suicidal thoughts and behaviours in males from the general population [14,15,2] and from particular at-risk groups [16].”

    From Masculinity and suicidal thinking (2017) · cites this paper as [2]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 124

Authors
Houle, J., Mishara, B. L., & Chagnon, F.
Affiliations
Université du Québec à Montréal (CA)
Corresponding author
Houle, Janie
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-04
Volume
107
Issue
1-3
Pages
37-43
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039191735
Cited by
124
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Keywords
male gender roles, suicidal behavior, men, suicide attempts, help-seeking, social support, mental health, mediation model, protective factors, risk factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude, Mental Disorders, Gender Identity, Health Status, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Probability, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Role, Sex Factors, Social Support, Suicide, Suicide, Attempted, Models, Statistical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review