The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
Recognition and subsequent treatment of patients with sub-threshold symptoms of depression in primary care
Abstract
Background Non-psychiatric physicians are better at correctly ruling out depressive disorders than appropriately recognising them. However, given large numbers of non-depressed patients, a small percentage of false positives equates to a greater number of patients than the number of depressed patients that GPs fail to detect. Concern thus arises that substantial numbers of patients with falsely identified depression may receive inappropriate interventions. Methods Unselected GP consulters were screened with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). GPs' perceptions of depression were independently rated on an ICD-10 scale. Case records were reviewed. Analysis related to participants with HADS-D Results GP perceived depression in false positive cases were more likely at index visit, to have a mental health presenting problem (OR=6.74 (95% CI=3.21, 14.16); receive antidepressant prescriptions (OR 3.79 (95% CI=1.69, 8.49) and have greater severity of HADS-D score (OR 1.18 (95% CI=1.01, 1.38). Subthreshold cases that GPs identified as depressed, more often had a recording, over subsequent six months, of: depressive symptoms (16 (35%) versus 26 (7%), p Limitations The HADS is not a diagnostic tool. Conclusions GPs' diagnoses of depressive disorder in patients with sub-threshold symptoms were appropriate. Interventions offered to this group were consistent with documented previous histories.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Older adults were more likely to be offered group therapy than individual therapy.
“the recent National Audit of Psychological Therapies found that older adults were more likely to be offered group therapy than individual therapy (Cameron et al., 2011”
From Barriers to treatment for older adults seeking psychological therapy (2015) · cites this paper as Cameron et al., 2011
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 40 · Cited by 19
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- Ani, 2008, Depression symptomatology and diagnosis: discordance between patients and physicians in primary care settings, BMC Family Practice, 9, 1, 10.1186/1471-2296-9-1 · DOI
- Aragones, 2004, Detection and management of depressive disorders in primary care in Spain, International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 34, 331, 10.2190/N835-FDYX-2E2E-V8XM · DOI
- Aragones, 2006, The overdiagnosis of depression in non-depressed patients in primary care, Family Practice, 23, 363, 10.1093/fampra/cmi120 · DOI
- Bellantuono, 2002, The identification of depression and the coverage of antidepressant drug prescriptions in Italian general practice, Journal of Affective Disorders, 72, 53, 10.1016/S0165-0327(01)00418-9 · DOI
- Berardi, 2005, Increased recognition of depression in primary care: comparison between primary-care physician and ICD-10 diagnosis of depression, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 74, 225, 10.1159/000085146 · DOI
- Bertakis, 2001, Patient gender differences in the diagnosis of depression in primary care, Journal of Women's Health & Gender-Based Medicine, 10, 689, 10.1089/15246090152563579 · DOI
- Borowsky, 2000, Who is at risk of nondetection of mental health problems in primary care?, Journal of General Internal Medicine, 15, 381, 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.12088.x · DOI
- Bushnell, 2004, Frequency of consultations and general practitioner recognition of psychological symptoms, The British Journal of General Practice, 54, 838
- Callahan, 1997, Depression in primary care: patient factors that influence recognition, Family Medicine, 29, 172
- Cameron, 2009, Appropriateness of antidepressant prescribing: an observational study in a Scottish primary-care setting, The British Journal of General Practice, 59, 644, 10.3399/bjgp09X454061 · DOI
- Cepoiu, 2008, Recognition of depression by non-psychiatric physicians – a systematic literature review and meta-analysis, Journal of General Internal Medicine, 23, 25, 10.1007/s11606-007-0428-5 · DOI
- Coyne, 1995, Nondetection of depression by primary care physicians reconsidered, General Hospital Psychiatry, 17, 3, 10.1016/0163-8343(94)00056-J · DOI
- Cruickshank, 2008, Cross-sectional survey of patients in receipt of long-term repeat prescriptions for antidepressant drugs in primary care, Mental Health in Family Medicine, 5, 105
- Diminic-Lisica, 2005, The prevalence and detection of depressive disorders in a Croatian primary care setting, Primary Care and Community Psychiatry, 10, 19, 10.1185/135525705X40373 · DOI
- Dowrick, 1995, Twelve months outcome of depression in general practice: does detection or disclosure make a difference?, British Medical Journal, 311, 1274, 10.1136/bmj.311.7015.1274 · DOI
- Freeling, 1985, Unrecognised depression in general practice, British Medical Journal Clinical Research Ed., 290, 1880, 10.1136/bmj.290.6485.1880 · DOI
- Garrard, 1998, Clinical detection of depression among community-based elderly people with self-reported symptoms of depression, The Journals of Gerontology. Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 53, M92, 10.1093/gerona/53A.2.M92 · DOI
- Gerber, 1989, Recognition of depression by internists in primary care: a comparison of internist and “gold standard” psychiatric assessments, Journal of General Internal Medicine, 4, 7, 10.1007/BF02596483 · DOI
- Henriksson, 2006, Infrequent use of antidepressants in depressed individuals (an interview and prescription database study in a defined Swedish population 2001–2002), European Psychiatry: The Journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists, 21, 355, 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2006.04.003 · DOI
- Judd, 1998, A prospective 12-year study of subsyndromal and syndromal depressive symptoms in unipolar major depressive disorders, Archives of General Psychiatry, 55, 694, 10.1001/archpsyc.55.8.694 · DOI · Paper page
- King, 2008, Prevalence of common mental disorders in general practice attendees across Europe, The British Journal of Psychiatry, 192, 362, 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.039966 · DOI
- Kirmayer, 1993, Somatization and the recognition of depression and anxiety in primary care, The American Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 734, 10.1176/ajp.150.5.734 · DOI
- Klinkman, 1998, False positives, false negatives, and the validity of the diagnosis of major depression in primary care, Archives of Family Medicine, 7, 451, 10.1001/archfami.7.5.451 · DOI
- Lecrubier, 2007, Widespread underrecognition and undertreatment of anxiety and mood disorders: results from 3 European studies, The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 68, 6
- Mitchell, 2009, Clinical diagnosis of depression in primary care: a meta-analysis, Lancet, 374, 589, 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60879-5 · DOI · Paper page
- Pfaff, 2005, A cross-sectional analysis of factors that influence the detection of depression in older primary care patients, The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 39, 262, 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2005.01563.x · DOI
- Schwenk, 1996, Differences between detected and undetected patients in primary care and depressed psychiatric patients, General Hospital Psychiatry, 18, 407, 10.1016/S0163-8343(96)00062-X · DOI
- Simon, 1995, Recognition, management, and outcomes of depression in primary care, Archives of Family Medicine, 4, 99, 10.1001/archfami.4.2.99 · DOI
- Spence, 2009, Black dog, British Medical Journal, 339, b3995, 10.1136/bmj.b3995 · DOI
- Thompson, 2001, Dimensional perspective on the recognition of depressive symptoms in primary care: The Hampshire Depression Project 3, The British Journal of Psychiatry, 179, 317, 10.1192/bjp.179.4.317 · DOI
- Tiemens, 1999, Diagnosis of depression by primary care physicians versus a structured diagnostic interview. Understanding discordance, General Hospital Psychiatry, 21, 87, 10.1016/S0163-8343(98)00077-2 · DOI
- Tylee, 1993, Why do general practitioners recognize major depression in one woman patient yet miss it in another?, The British Journal of General Practice, 43, 327
- Volkers, 2004, The problem of diagnosing major depression in elderly primary care patients, Journal of Affective Disorders, 82, 259, 10.1016/j.jad.2003.11.003 · DOI
- Wittchen, 2001, Prevalence and correlates of generalized anxiety disorders in primary care, Fortschritte der Medizin. Originalien, 119, 17
- Zigmond, 1983, The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD), Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67, 361, 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Cameron, I. M., Lawton, K., & Reid, I. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Aberdeen (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Cameron, Isobel M.
- Venue
- Journal of Affective Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-04
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 99-105
- ISSN
- 0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2015474404
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Centre for Change and Innovation of the Scottish Executive
- NHS Grampian Department of Research and Development
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
- Keywords
- subthreshold depression, depressive symptoms, general practitioners, diagnostic accuracy, false positives, antidepressant prescribing, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, primary care, mental health service referral, overdiagnosis
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Antidepressive Agents, Depressive Disorder, Diagnostic Errors, False Positive Reactions, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Primary Health Care, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Scotland, Multivariate Analysis, Chi-Square Distribution, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Statistics, Nonparametric, Inappropriate Prescribing, General Practitioners
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review