Cited by 172Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and AccessHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Humanistic and economic burden of generalized anxiety disorder in North America and Europe

Revicki, Dennis A., Travers, Karin, Wyrwich, Kathleen W., Svedsäter, Henrik, Locklear, Julie, Mattera, Maria Stoeckl, Sheehan, David V., Montgomery, Stuart·2012·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background To review the humanistic and economic burden of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library, limited to articles published in English, between 1987 and 2010, in North America, Europe and Australia. The key focus was humanistic or functional outcomes, cost of illness and economic outcomes. Ninety articles fitting criteria on (a) GAD study population, (b) United States, Europe or Australia, and (c) humanistic burden or economic burden were reviewed. Methods and findings were summarized by two researchers; inconsistencies were resolved by a third reviewer. Results GAD was associated with increased impairments in psychosocial functioning, role functioning, work productivity and health-related quality of life (HRQL). The HRQL impairments were comparable with those associated with depression or panic disorder. Patients with GAD and co-morbid depression reported significantly greater impairment in HRQL than did those with either disorder alone. GAD patients had significantly higher median medical costs than primary care patients without GAD (US $2375 versus $1448). The mean annual medical cost of GAD was $2138 higher than for other anxiety disorders (mean $6475). Finally, GAD was frequently under-recognized in primary care, and available studies reported that only 20% to 32% of patients were adequately treated. Limitations The review was limited to pharmacologic treatments for GAD and to publications in English. Conclusions GAD is…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2011.11.014

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 75 · Cited by 172

Authors
Revicki, D. A., Travers, K., Wyrwich, K. W., Svedsäter, H., Locklear, J., Mattera, M. S., Sheehan, D. V., & Montgomery, S.
Affiliations
  • AstraZeneca (United States) (US)
  • University of South Florida (US)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Revicki, Dennis A.
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-10
Volume
140
Issue
2
Pages
103-112
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2065796326
Cited by
172
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
AstraZeneca
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords
generalized anxiety disorder, economic burden, humanistic burden, health-related quality of life, labor productivity, role functioning, health care costs, comorbid depression, anxiety disorders, health care utilization
MeSH terms
Anxiety Disorders, Australia, Europe, Humans, North America, Quality of Life, United States, Cost of Illness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review