Humanistic and economic burden of generalized anxiety disorder in North America and Europe
Abstract
Background To review the humanistic and economic burden of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library, limited to articles published in English, between 1987 and 2010, in North America, Europe and Australia. The key focus was humanistic or functional outcomes, cost of illness and economic outcomes. Ninety articles fitting criteria on (a) GAD study population, (b) United States, Europe or Australia, and (c) humanistic burden or economic burden were reviewed. Methods and findings were summarized by two researchers; inconsistencies were resolved by a third reviewer. Results GAD was associated with increased impairments in psychosocial functioning, role functioning, work productivity and health-related quality of life (HRQL). The HRQL impairments were comparable with those associated with depression or panic disorder. Patients with GAD and co-morbid depression reported significantly greater impairment in HRQL than did those with either disorder alone. GAD patients had significantly higher median medical costs than primary care patients without GAD (US $2375 versus $1448). The mean annual medical cost of GAD was $2138 higher than for other anxiety disorders (mean $6475). Finally, GAD was frequently under-recognized in primary care, and available studies reported that only 20% to 32% of patients were adequately treated. Limitations The review was limited to pharmacologic treatments for GAD and to publications in English. Conclusions GAD is…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research has demonstrated this trend for individuals suffering from GAD specifically.
“Research has also demonstrated this trend for individuals suffering from GAD specifically”
From Treatment histories, barriers, and preferences for individuals with symptoms of generalized anxiety disorder (2024) · cites this paper as Revicki et al., 2012
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 75 · Cited by 172
- Authors
- Revicki, D. A., Travers, K., Wyrwich, K. W., Svedsäter, H., Locklear, J., Mattera, M. S., Sheehan, D. V., & Montgomery, S.
- Affiliations
- AstraZeneca (United States) (US)
- University of South Florida (US)
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Revicki, Dennis A.
- Venue
- Journal of Affective Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-10
- Volume
- 140
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 103-112
- ISSN
- 0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2065796326
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 75
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 0.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- AstraZeneca
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Keywords
- generalized anxiety disorder, economic burden, humanistic burden, health-related quality of life, labor productivity, role functioning, health care costs, comorbid depression, anxiety disorders, health care utilization
- MeSH terms
- Anxiety Disorders, Australia, Europe, Humans, North America, Quality of Life, United States, Cost of Illness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review