Baseline delta sleep ratio predicts acute ketamine mood response in major depressive disorder
Open accessAbstract
Background Electroencephalographic (EEG) sleep slow wave activity (SWA; EEG power between 0.6 and 4Hz) has been proposed as a marker of central synaptic plasticity. Decreased generation of sleep slow waves--a core feature of sleep in depression--indicates underlying plasticity changes in the disease. Various measures of SWA have previously been used to predict antidepressant treatment response. This study examined the relationship between baseline patterns of SWA in the first two NREM episodes and antidepressant response to an acute infusion of the N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist ketamine. Methods Thirty patients (20M, 10F, 18-65) fulfilling DSM-IV criteria for treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (MDD) who had been drug-free for two weeks received a single open-label infusion of ketamine hydrochloride (.5mg/kg) over 40 min. Depressive symptoms were assessed with the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) before and after ketamine infusion. Sleep recordings were obtained the night before the infusion and were visually scored. SWA was computed for individual artifact-free NREM sleep epochs, and averaged for each NREM episode. Delta sleep ratio (DSR) was calculated as SWA(NREM1)/SWA(NREM2). Results A significant positive correlation was observed between baseline DSR and reduced MADRS scores from baseline to Day 1 (r=.414, p=.02). Limitations The sample size was relatively small (N=30) and all subjects had treatment-resistant MDD, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Further studies are needed to replicate and extend this observation to other patient groups. Conclusions DSR may be a useful baseline predictor of ketamine response in individuals with treatment-resistant MDD.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Low baseline delta sleep ratio has been suggested to predict acute antidepressant effects of ketamine in MDD.
“Low baseline delta sleep ratio, defined as decreased SWA earlier in the night compared with later in the night, has also been suggested to predict acute antidepressant effects of ketamine in MDD.138”
From Ketamine as an antidepressant: Overview of its mechanisms of action and potential predictive biomarkers (2020) · cites this paper as [138]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 29 · Cited by 86
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Borbely A Two process model of sleep regulation Hum Neurobiology 1982 1 195 204 7185792
- First MB Spitzer RL Gibbon M Williams AR Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV TR Axis I Disorders, Research Version, Patient Edition (SCID-I/P) 2001 New York New York State Psychiatric Institute, Biometrics Research
- Kupfer DJ Frank E McEachran AB Grochocinski VJ Delta sleep ratio. A biological correlate of early recurrence in unipolar affective disorder Arch Gen Psychiatry 1990 47 1100 1105 2244794
- Rosenthal R Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research (Revised Edition) 1991 Newbury Park Sage Publications
- Authors
- Duncan, W. C., Selter, J., Brutsche, N., Sarasso, S., & Zarate, C. A.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Affective Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-02
- Volume
- 145
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 115-119
- ISSN
- 0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3494813
- OpenAlex
- W2110449405
- Cited by
- 86
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8
- FWCI
- 4.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Mental Health
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
- Keywords
- ketamine, major depressive disorder, treatment-resistant depression, antidepressant response prediction, NMDA receptor antagonists, NREM sleep, EEG biomarkers, synaptic plasticity
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Aged, Antidepressive Agents, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Drug Resistance, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Ketamine, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Sleep, Biomarkers, N-Methylaspartate, Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review