Cited by 43Mental Health Treatment and AccessSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesSchool Health and Nursing Education

Depression knowledge in high school students: effectiveness of the adolescent depression awareness program

Ruble, Anne E., Leon, Phillip J., Gilley-Hensley, Laura, Hess, Sally G., Swartz, Karen L.·2013·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Major depression is a common disorder among teenagers and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Suicide is the third leading cause of death among 15-24 year olds. Early identification and treatment is essential to prevent suicide. Depression education is a potential intervention for improving knowledge about depression and help-seeking behavior.Methods The Adolescent Depression Awareness Program (ADAP) is a school-based depression education intervention with a core message that depression is a treatable medical illness. 710 high school students from six schools in Tulsa, OK participated in the study comparing changes in knowledge about depression and attitudes toward treatment-seeking between students receiving the intervention and those who did not. Changes in depression knowledge and attitude toward help-seeking were measured using the ADAP Depression Knowledge Questionnaire (ADKQ).Results There was a significant positive change in ADKQ score for students receiving the intervention but not in the control group. The intervention group also demonstrated a significant difference in willingness to "tell someone" if concerned about depression in a peer, which was not present in the control group.Limitations The students were not randomized to the intervention and control groups. The ADKQ evaluates attitudes about help-seeking but not behavior.Conclusions A school-based educational intervention improved knowledge about depression and attitudes toward help-seeking in adolescents. Future studies should investigate if such change in knowledge results in help-seeking behaviors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2013.05.033

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 43

Authors
Ruble, A. E., Leon, P. J., Gilley-Hensley, L., Hess, S. G., & Swartz, K. L.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
  • Greater Baltimore Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Swartz, Karen L.
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-09
Volume
150
Issue
3
Pages
1025-1030
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2060791083
Cited by
43
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Oklahoma
  • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
Keywords
adolescent depression, depression knowledge, help-seeking attitudes, suicide prevention, high school students, help-seeking, peer disclosure
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Awareness, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Female, Health Education, Health Promotion, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Peer Group, Surveys and Questionnaires, Schools, Students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review