Cited by 77Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersFamily Caregiving in Mental IllnessFamily and Disability Support Research

Caregiver burden, family accommodation, health, and well-being in relatives of individuals with hoarding disorder

Drury, Helena, Ajmi, Sana, Fernández de la Cruz, Lorena, Nordsletten, Ashley E., Mataix-Cols, David·2014·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Hoarding Disorder (HD), a new diagnostic entity in DSM-5, is associated with substantial functional impairment and family frustration but data from well-characterized samples is lacking. Method Participants were 37 individuals meeting DSM-5 criteria for HD, 55 relatives of individuals meeting criteria for HD, and comparison groups of 51 self-identified collectors and 25 relatives of collectors. All participants completed a clinician-administered diagnostic interview for HD and an online battery of standardized measures of health, well-being, and impairment. Results Substantial functional impairment was found for both HD individuals and their relatives. HD relatives reported significantly greater carer burden and accommodation of hoarding behaviors than relatives of collectors. Perceived level of squalor, co-habiting with, and increasing age of the HD individual were significant predictors of carer burden and functional impairment in the relatives. Limitations The use of self-identified HD individuals may have produced a bias towards participants with relatively good insight. Subjective biases in self-reported symptoms cannot be ruled out, although the use of informant-report data provided some independent validation. Conclusions HD is associated with substantial functional impairment for both sufferers and their relatives. The level of carer burden experienced by HD relatives was comparable to or greater than that reported in the literature by relatives of individu…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2014.01.023

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 42 · Cited by 77

Authors
Drury, H., Ajmi, S., Fernández de la Cruz, L., Nordsletten, A. E., & Mataix-Cols, D.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Drury, Helena
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-04
Volume
159
Pages
7-14
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2104920000
Cited by
77
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
FWCI
5.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
Keywords
hoarding disorder, caregiver burden, family accommodation, functional disability, family well-being, squalor, collectors, family involvement in treatment, DSM-5
MeSH terms
Hoarding Disorder, Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Family, Female, Health Status, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Caregivers, Cost of Illness, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review