MiRNA-206 and BDNF genes interacted in bipolar I disorder.
Abstract
Background Several lines of evidence have suggested that has-mir-206 (miRNA-206) may regulate brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) protein synthesis. The primary aim of this study was to determine whether miRNA-206 gene (MIR206) may confer susceptibility to bipolar disorder type I (BD-I) and treatment response to mood stabilizers. Also, we intended to verify the hypothesis that a potential interplay of MIR206 and BDNF may influence the genetic risk for BD-I and treatment response.Methods The MIR206 rs16882131 and BDNF rs6265 polymorphisms were genotyped in 280 BD-I patients and 288 healthy controls. Treatment response to lithium and valproate was retrospectively determined.Results No association was observed in the individual polymorphism with regards to risk of BD-I and treatment response. Our results showed a significant gene to gene interaction between the MIR206 rs16882131 and BDNF rs6265 polymorphisms that contribute to BD-I susceptibility and treatment response. Further analysis showed a significant interaction between MIR206 and BDNF on treatment score (F3, 138=8.61, P=0.046), and individuals with MIR206 T/T+TC and BDNF A/A genotypes had a significantly lower mean treatment score than those with MIR206 CC and BDNF A/A+A/G as well as those with MIR206 CC and BDNF G/G genotypes (P=0.018 and 0.013, respectively).Limitation This is a preliminary investigation with relatively small sample size.Conclusion Our findings provide initial evidence of the gene-to-gene interaction of MIR206 and BDNF in regards to the risk for BD-I as well as treatment response to mood stabilizers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
MiR-206 was first thought to regulate skeletal muscle embryonic development.
“MiR-206, a member of the muscle-specific miR-1 family, was first thought to regulate skeletal muscle embryonic development [31].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 44
- Authors
- Wang, Z., Zhang, C., Huang, J., Yuan, C., Hong, W., Chen, J., Yu, S., Xu, L., Gao, K., & Fang, Y.
- Affiliations
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
- Kunming Institute of Zoology (CN)
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zhang, Chen
- Fang, Yiru
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Affective Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-06
- Volume
- 162
- Pages
- 116-119
- ISSN
- 0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2086755370
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 4.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University
- Dalhousie University
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Keywords
- brain-derived neurotrophic factor, bipolar I disorder, gene-gene interaction, genetic susceptibility, lithium, valproic acid, BDNF Val66Met polymorphism, polymorphism
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Bipolar Disorder, Epistasis, Genetic, Female, Genotype, Humans, Male, Polymorphism, Genetic, Retrospective Studies, Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, MicroRNAs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review