Cited by 44Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentSchizophrenia research and treatmentGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

MiRNA-206 and BDNF genes interacted in bipolar I disorder.

Wang, Zuowei, Zhang, Chen, Huang, Jia, Yuan, Chengmei, Hong, Wu, Chen, Jun, Yu, Shunying, Xu, Lin +2 more·2014·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Several lines of evidence have suggested that has-mir-206 (miRNA-206) may regulate brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) protein synthesis. The primary aim of this study was to determine whether miRNA-206 gene (MIR206) may confer susceptibility to bipolar disorder type I (BD-I) and treatment response to mood stabilizers. Also, we intended to verify the hypothesis that a potential interplay of MIR206 and BDNF may influence the genetic risk for BD-I and treatment response.Methods The MIR206 rs16882131 and BDNF rs6265 polymorphisms were genotyped in 280 BD-I patients and 288 healthy controls. Treatment response to lithium and valproate was retrospectively determined.Results No association was observed in the individual polymorphism with regards to risk of BD-I and treatment response. Our results showed a significant gene to gene interaction between the MIR206 rs16882131 and BDNF rs6265 polymorphisms that contribute to BD-I susceptibility and treatment response. Further analysis showed a significant interaction between MIR206 and BDNF on treatment score (F3, 138=8.61, P=0.046), and individuals with MIR206 T/T+TC and BDNF A/A genotypes had a significantly lower mean treatment score than those with MIR206 CC and BDNF A/A+A/G as well as those with MIR206 CC and BDNF G/G genotypes (P=0.018 and 0.013, respectively).Limitation This is a preliminary investigation with relatively small sample size.Conclusion Our findings provide initial evidence of the gene-to-gene interaction of MIR206 and BDNF in regards to the risk for BD-I as well as treatment response to mood stabilizers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2014.03.047

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 44

Authors
Wang, Z., Zhang, C., Huang, J., Yuan, C., Hong, W., Chen, J., Yu, S., Xu, L., Gao, K., & Fang, Y.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
  • Kunming Institute of Zoology (CN)
  • University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
  • Zhang, Chen
  • Fang, Yiru
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-06
Volume
162
Pages
116-119
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086755370
Cited by
44
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1
FWCI
4.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University
  • Dalhousie University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
brain-derived neurotrophic factor, bipolar I disorder, gene-gene interaction, genetic susceptibility, lithium, valproic acid, BDNF Val66Met polymorphism, polymorphism
MeSH terms
Adult, Bipolar Disorder, Epistasis, Genetic, Female, Genotype, Humans, Male, Polymorphism, Genetic, Retrospective Studies, Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, MicroRNAs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review