Role of depression severity and impulsivity in the relationship between hopelessness and suicidal ideation in patients with major depressive disorder
Abstract
Background Hopelessness, depression and impulsivity all contribute to the development of suicidal ideation in patients with major depressive disorder, but the pathway of these factors to suicidal ideation is not clear. This study examined the meditating effect of depression severity on the relationship between hopelessness and suicidal ideation and explored how this mediating effect was moderated by impulsivity.Methods A total of 162 patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) completed a structured clinical diagnostic interview and a battery of scales assessing depression severity, hopelessness, suicidal ideation, and impulsivity. Regression analyses with bootstrapping methods were used to examine the mediating and moderating effects of various risk factors.Results Mediation analysis revealed a significant indirect effect of hopelessness on suicidal ideation, and the effect was fully mediated through depression severity. On moderation analysis, the moderating effects of the relationship between depression severity and suicidal ideation were significant in both the medium and high impulsivity groups.Limitations The present study was limited by the assessment of trait impulsivity and observer-rated depression severity, which might not fully reflect momentary impulsivity and feeling of depression when suicidal ideation occurs.Conclusion Depression severity plays a mediator role in the relationship between hopelessness and suicidal ideation and this mechanism is contingent on the levels of impulsivity. MDD patients with higher impulsivity appear to be more likely to have suicidal ideations even when they are less depressed. These findings highlight the importance of impulsivity assessment and alleviation of depressive symptoms to prevent suicidality in patients with MDD.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Traditional epidemiological studies gave insight into the role of more static risk factors of suicidal behavior, such as sex and a history of depression.
“Analysis from traditional epidemiological studies gave insight into the role of more static risk factors of suicidal behavior, such as sex and a history of depression (Brown et al., 2000; Wang et al., 2015)”
From Modelling suicide ideation from beep to beep: application of network analysis to ecological momentary assessment data (2019) · cites this paper as Wang et al., 2015
Traditional epidemiological studies neglected the dynamic nature of suicidal ideation and its psychological risk factors.
“but neglected the dynamic nature of suicidal ideation and its psychological risk factors.”
From Modelling suicide ideation from beep to beep: application of network analysis to ecological momentary assessment data (2019) · cites this paper as Wang et al., 2015
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 51 · Cited by 138
- Authors
- Wang, Y.-Y., Jiang, N.-Z., Cheung, E. F. C., Sun, H.-W., & Chan, R. C. K.
- Affiliations
- Castle Peak Hospital (CN)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Venue
- Journal of Affective Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-09
- Volume
- 183
- Pages
- 83-89
- ISSN
- 0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1846242894
- Cited by
- 138
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 9 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 9.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Repository of Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion)
- The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Scientific and Technological Project of Shandong Province (2010GSF10226)
- Humanities and Social Science Foundation of the College of Shandong Province (J11WH076)
- Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, and the Knowledge Innovation Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (KSCX2-EW-J-8)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- major depressive disorder, suicidal ideation, hopelessness, depression severity, impulsivity, mediation, moderation, suicide risk factors
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Self Concept, Severity of Illness Index, Suicide, Attempted, Suicidal Ideation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review