Neural correlates of self-referential processing and implicit self-associations in chronic depression
Open accessAbstract
Background Patients with depression tend to process negative information with regard to the self (i.e. self-referential processing). A better understanding of the neural underpinnings of self-referential processing in patients with depression is clinically important as it can inform on potential treatment targets.Method This fMRI study sought to study the neural correlates of self-referential processing in patients with chronic major depressive disorder (cMDD) (n=17) and non-patient controls (n=18) using a passive processing paradigm. Stimuli consisted of positive, negative, negative depression related and neutral personality trait words or non-words. Participants were instructed to indicate whether a presented word was an existing word or a non-word while undergoing an fMRI scan. Participants also completed an explicit and an implicit measure of positive and negative self-associations outside the scanner.Results Non-patient controls had relatively increased activity in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) during processing of negative depression related vs. neutral words whereas patients with cMDD had relatively decreased activity. Non-patient controls had relatively increased dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) activity during processing of positive vs. neutral words whereas patients with cMDD had relatively decreased activity. Explicit but not implicit self-associations with depression related words were associated with neural activity in the mPFC and the dlPFC.Limitations The study did not include a clinical control group and therefore the specificity of findings remains unknown.Conclusions The distinct neural processing of emotional self-relevant stimuli in the mPFC and the dlPFC in patients with cMDD might represent an emotional blunting response towards negative self-relevant stimuli.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Only one study to date (Renner et al., 2015) has examined the neural correlates of implicit associations (in a chronic depressed sample) and found no relation.
“To our knowledge, only one study to date (Renner et al., 2015) has examined the neural correlates of implicit associations (in a chronic depressed sample) and found no relation.”
From Understanding and predicting future relapse in depression from resting state functional connectivity and self-referential processing (2023) · cites this paper as Renner et al., 2015
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 29 · Cited by 29
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [5]5. van der Does, A.J.W., 2002. Handleiding: De Nederlandse versie van de Beck De- pression Inventory, 2de Editie. (The Dutch Version of the Beck Depression In- ventory, 2nd ed.). Swets and Zeitlinger B.V., Lisse.
- Authors
- Renner, F., Siep, N., Lobbestael, J., Arntz, A., Peeters, F. P. M. L., & Huibers, M. J. H.
- Affiliations
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB)
- Maastricht University (NL)
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Corresponding author
- Renner, Fritz
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Affective Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-11
- Volume
- 186
- Pages
- 40-47
- ISSN
- 0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1868943479
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 3.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- FreiDok plus (Universitätsbibliothek Freiburg) (submittedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Universiteit Maastricht
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Keywords
- self-referential processing, medial prefrontal cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, emotional blunting, neural correlates of depression
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Major Depressive Disorder, Emotions, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Mental Processes, Middle Aged, Case-Control Studies, Prefrontal Cortex
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review