Cited by 104Child Abuse and TraumaEpigenetics and DNA MethylationStress Responses and Cortisol

Glucocorticoid receptor DNA methylation, childhood maltreatment and major depression

Open access
Bustamante, Angela C., Aiello, Allison E., Galea, Sandro, Ratanatharathorn, Andrew, Noronha, Carol, Wildman, Derek E., Uddin, Monica·2016·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Introduction Altered DNA methylation (DNAm) levels of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis genes has been associated with exposure to childhood maltreatment (CM) and depression; however, it is unknown whether CM and depression have joint and potentially interacting effects on the glucocorticoid receptor (NR3C1) DNAm. We investigated the impact of CM and lifetime major depressive disorder (MDD) on NR3C1 DNAm and gene expression (GE) in 147 adult participants from the Detroit Neighborhood Health Study.Methods NR3C1 promoter region DNAm was assessed via pyrosequencing using whole blood-derived DNA. Quantitative RT-PCR assays measured GE from leukocyte-derived RNA. Linear regression models were used to examine the relationship among CM, MDD, and DNAm.Results Both CM and MDD were significant predictors of NR3C1 DNAm: CM was associated with an increase in DNAm in an EGR1 transcription factor binding site (TFBS), whereas MDD was associated with a decrease in DNAm downstream of the TFBS. No significant CM-MDD interactions were observed. CM alone was associated with significantly lower NR3C1 GE.Limitations Our report of CM is a retrospective self-report of abuse, which may introduce recall bias. DNAm was measured in whole blood and may not reflect brain-derived DNAm levels.Conclusions CM and MDD are both associated with altered DNAm levels in the NR3C1 promoter region, however the location and direction of effects differ between the two exposures, and the functional effects, as measured by GE, appear to be limited to CM exposure alone. CM exposure may be biologically embedded in this key HPA axis gene.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2016.07.038

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Subsequent studies have confirmed similar NR3C1 methylation patterns in peripheral blood, suggesting a promising but not yet clinically validated peripheral biomarker of central stress dysregulation.

    “Subsequent studies have confirmed similar patterns in peripheral blood, suggesting a promising but not yet clinically validated peripheral biomarker of central stress dysregulation (56, 57).”

    From Exploring the neurobiological markers of suicidal behaviors in pediatric population: a narrative review (2026) · cites this paper as [57]

    The Introduction reports NR3C1 methylation patterns in blood after early-life adversity, and the Discussion says similar blood and brain methylation levels make blood changes a potentially useful biomarker. The paper does not establish clinical validation status, and its Limitations section notes that it did not assess whether its methylation findings were associated with cortisol levels. Thus the proposed biomarker is supported, but the specific claim about clinical validation and central stress dysregulation goes beyond what this study shows. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 60 · Cited by 104

Authors
Bustamante, A. C., Aiello, A. E., Galea, S., Ratanatharathorn, A., Noronha, C., Wildman, D. E., & Uddin, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Boston University (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Wayne State University (US)
Corresponding author
Uddin, Monica
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-12
Volume
206
Pages
181-188
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2486596541
Cited by
104
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7
FWCI
13.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (RC1MH088283)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA022720)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P2CHD050924)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
glucocorticoid receptor, NR3C1, DNA methylation, child abuse, major depressive disorder, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, gene expression, biological embedding, childhood adversity
MeSH terms
Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Leukocytes, Male, Middle Aged, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Receptors, Glucocorticoid, Retrospective Studies, Gene Expression, DNA Methylation, Early Growth Response Protein 1, Adult Survivors of Child Abuse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review