Cited by 122Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentSchizophrenia research and treatmentTreatment of Major Depression

Maintenance therapy with second generation antipsychotics for bipolar disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Lindström, Leif, Lindström, Eva, Nilsson, Mikael, Höistad, Malin·2017·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Second generations antipsychotics (SGA) are frequently used for maintenance treatment in bipolar disorder. We systematically reviewed the efficacy and long-term effects of treatment with SGA, regardless of treatment strategy (SGA administered either as monotherapy or as adjunctive therapy), in comparison to placebo, lithium or valproate. Primary outcomes were relapses (mood episode recurrence) and discontinuation. Method Clinical studies were identified through database searching in PubMed, Embase, PsychInfo and Cochrane Library and critically appraised based on the Cochrane Handbook. Full data extraction of raw data was performed and analyzed with meta-analyses, and level of evidence graded using GRADE. Only randomized controlled studies (RCT) and observational studies were included, with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. Comparators used were restricted to placebo, lithium, valproate or other anti-epileptic drugs. Results We identified 15 RCTs on SGA in bipolar disorder with follow-up-time of 6 months up to 2 years, and one observational study reporting long-term effects of up to 4 years. A total of 6142 patients were included in the randomized trials. No long-term RCTs beyond 2 years follow-up was identified. All RCTs except for one included patients with bipolar disorder type I only. All RCTs except for two included patients pre-stabilized on the drug under investigation prior to randomization (enrichment design). For SGA as adjunctive therapy to lithium or valproate, meta-analyses showed that treatment with either aripiprazole (RR: 0.65, 95% CI 0.50-0.85), quetiapine (RR: 0.38, 95% CI 0.32-0.46) or ziprasidone (RR: 0.62, 95% CI 0.40-0.96) reduced the overall risk of relapses in patients that had responded during the stabilization phase. Adjunctive therapy with quetiapine was the only drug that reduced both manic and depressive episodes. For SGA as monotherapy, only quetiapine was shown to be better than lithium/ valproate for both manic and depressive relapses, but only for patients stabilized on quetiapine during the acute phase. As monotherapy, olanzapine, quetiapine and risperidone were shown to be superior to placebo in reducing the overall risk of relapses. Limitations There were considerable limitations to the evidence base of maintenance treatment with SGA in bipolar disorder. Most studies used stabilized patients, i.e. enrichment design (selection bias), had considerable dropout levels (attrition bias), and variable degree of reporting bias. No long-term RCT data on efficacy is available beyond 2 years, and almost all studies are on bipolar disorder type I patients only. Despite these limitations, we elucidate quantitative findings from meta-analyses conducted on the randomized trials published on the topic.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2017.02.012

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is now increasingly evidence that supervised exercise training, a key component of the DPP, can improve psychiatric symptoms, cognition and functioning across a range of mental disorders.

    “Furthermore, there is now increasingly evidence that supervised exercise training (a key component of the DPP) can improve psychiatric symptoms, cognition and functioning across a range of mental disorders 237-239”
  • Exercise interventions delivered by qualified exercise professionals have significantly greater benefits and adherence rates than those delivered by mental health or research staff alone.

    “Using qualified exercise professionals is recommended for delivering exercise interventions in people mental disorders, as such interventions have significantly greater benefits and adherence rates than those delivered using mental health/research staff alone.237,282,283”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 122

Authors
Lindström, L., Lindström, E., Nilsson, M., & Höistad, M.
Affiliations
  • Uppsala University Hospital (SE)
  • Malmö University (SE)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Höistad, Malin
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-04
Volume
213
Pages
138-150
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2587914386
Cited by
122
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 8
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Malmö University Publications (Malmö University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
BP Global
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
bipolar disorder, atypical antipsychotics, maintenance therapy, relapse prevention, adjunctive therapy, lithium, valproic acid, quetiapine, aripiprazole, ziprasidone, olanzapine, risperidone, long-term treatment outcomes, manic and depressive episodes, treatment discontinuation, mood stabilizers
MeSH terms
Bipolar Disorder, Humans, Antipsychotic Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review