History of suicide attempt and right superior temporal gyrus volume in youth with treatment-resistant major depressive disorder
Abstract
Background Growing evidence suggests an endophenotype for suicidality, including brain morphometric features, could provide an improved platform for suicide risk assessment. Reduced right superior temporal gyrus (rSTG) volumes have been implicated in suicidality across psychiatric disorders. Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) has unique neurobiology and adolescents with TRD are at increased suicide risk. Here, we investigated whether reduced rSTG volume was present in adolescents with TRD and history of suicide attempt.Methods 45 adolescents - 14 with history of suicide attempt and TRD, 14 without a suicide attempt history and TRD, and 17 healthy controls - underwent magnetic resonance imaging and reconstructed rSTG volumes were compared. Depressive and anxious symptoms were assessed with Hamilton depression and anxiety rating scales, and differences between attempters and non-attempters were explored.Results Adolescents with TRD and history of suicide attempt showed reduced rSTG volume compared to healthy controls. Exploratory analyses revealed greater diurnal variation in depressive symptoms in the suicide attempt group compared to non-attempters.Limitations Sample size and temporal separation between suicide attempt date and data collection limits interpretation of findings.Conclusions Reduced rSTG volume may serve as a marker of suicide attempt in adolescence and specific symptom features may have a role in suicide risk assessment. Presently, risk assessment is limited by patient self-report and clinical judgement. A biological model of suicidality will be key to improve risk assessment and could lead to novel treatment approaches. Our findings extend previous results and contribute to our neurobiological understanding of suicidality.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
MDD attempters have reduced right superior temporal gyrus gray matter volume relative to healthy adolescents but not relative to MDD non-attempters.
“MDD attempters have reduced right superior temporal gyrus (STG) GMV relative to healthy adolescents but not compared to MDD non-attempters (60, 61).”
From Neural correlates associated with suicide and nonsuicidal self-injury in youth (2021) · cites this paper as [60]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 15 · Cited by 53
- Authors
- McLellan, Q., Wilkes, T. C., Swansburg, R., Jaworska, N., Langevin, L. M., & MacMaster, F. P.
- Affiliations
- University of Calgary (CA)
- University of Ottawa (CA)
- Corresponding author
- MacMaster, Frank P.
- Venue
- Journal of Affective Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-10
- Volume
- 239
- Pages
- 291-294
- ISSN
- 0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2883586680
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 4.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Children's Hospital Aid Society
- Canada Foundation for Innovation
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute
- Alberta Children's Hospital Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- suicide attempts, treatment-resistant depression, adolescent depression, brain morphometry, suicide risk assessment
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Suicide, Attempted, Temporal Lobe, Case-Control Studies, Self Report, Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review