The association between an anxiety disorder and cancer in medical history
Abstract
Background Cancer patients can feel depression and anxiety any time after a cancer diagnosis. The Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) is an instrument for the assessment of anxiety. The main objective of this work was to compare general anxiety levels between cancer survivors and individuals without a history of cancer in a population-based study (LIFE-ADULT) with 10,000 participants.Methods All participants (18-80 years) completed the GAD-7 and other psychological and medical questionnaires. A score of 10 or greater for GAD-7 (of total 21) indicates a probable generalized anxiety disorder.Results 954 participants reported a diagnosis of cancer in their medical history. In the multivariate analysis an anxiety disorder was associated with prior cancer diagnosis (OR: 1.8; 95% CI [1.4-2.4]), age -every additional year- (OR: 0.983; [0.976-0.991]), female gender (OR: 1.8; [1.5-2.2]) and low socioeconomic status (OR: 2.0; [1.7-2.5]) all p < 0.001. There were no significant associations between general anxiety and other comorbidities, such as myocardial infarction (OR: 1.0; p = 0.948), stroke (OR: 1.4; p = 0.237) or diabetes (OR: 1.0; p = 0.326). There was also no significant difference in anxiety disorder among cancer survivors regarding the time passed since the initial cancer diagnosis (OR: 1.1; [0.6-1.9], p = 0.804 comparing 5-10 years after a diagnosis of cancer vs. ≤5 years and OR: 0.6; [0.4-1.1], p = 0.107 comparing >10 vs. ≤5 years).Limitations This study has a cross-sectional character, therefore, causal conclusions cannot be drawn.Conclusion Cancer survivors may require screening for anxiety disorders and long-term professional psychosocial support.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Gender is a risk factor for anxiety in patients with cancer in general.
“which is consistent with gender being a risk factor for anxiety in patients with cancer in general [42].”
From The Psychosocial Impact of COVID-19 on Older Adults with Cancer: A Rapid Review (2022) · cites this paper as [42]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 11 · Cited by 22
- Authors
- Zeynalova, N., Schimpf, S., Setter, C., Yahiaoui-Doktor, M., Zeynalova, S., Lordick, F., Loeffler, M., & Hinz, A.
- Affiliations
- Leipzig University (DE)
- University Hospital Leipzig (DE)
- University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Zeynalova, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Affective Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 246
- Pages
- 640-642
- ISSN
- 0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2904279341
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 1.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- European Regional Development Fund
- Universität Leipzig
- LIFE programme
- European Commission
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Keywords
- cancer survivors, anxiety disorders, generalized anxiety disorder, GAD-7, cancer history, socioeconomic status, gender differences, age, psychosocial support, anxiety screening, comorbidities
- MeSH terms
- Cancer Survivors, Patient Health Questionnaire, Aged, Anxiety Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Medical History Taking, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Surveys and Questionnaires, Comorbidity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review