Cited by 22Cancer survivorship and careAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and Access

The association between an anxiety disorder and cancer in medical history

Zeynalova, N., Schimpf, S., Setter, C., Yahiaoui-Doktor, M., Zeynalova, S., Lordick, F., Loeffler, M., Hinz, A.·2019·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Cancer patients can feel depression and anxiety any time after a cancer diagnosis. The Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) is an instrument for the assessment of anxiety. The main objective of this work was to compare general anxiety levels between cancer survivors and individuals without a history of cancer in a population-based study (LIFE-ADULT) with 10,000 participants.Methods All participants (18-80 years) completed the GAD-7 and other psychological and medical questionnaires. A score of 10 or greater for GAD-7 (of total 21) indicates a probable generalized anxiety disorder.Results 954 participants reported a diagnosis of cancer in their medical history. In the multivariate analysis an anxiety disorder was associated with prior cancer diagnosis (OR: 1.8; 95% CI [1.4-2.4]), age -every additional year- (OR: 0.983; [0.976-0.991]), female gender (OR: 1.8; [1.5-2.2]) and low socioeconomic status (OR: 2.0; [1.7-2.5]) all p < 0.001. There were no significant associations between general anxiety and other comorbidities, such as myocardial infarction (OR: 1.0; p = 0.948), stroke (OR: 1.4; p = 0.237) or diabetes (OR: 1.0; p = 0.326). There was also no significant difference in anxiety disorder among cancer survivors regarding the time passed since the initial cancer diagnosis (OR: 1.1; [0.6-1.9], p = 0.804 comparing 5-10 years after a diagnosis of cancer vs. ≤5 years and OR: 0.6; [0.4-1.1], p = 0.107 comparing >10 vs. ≤5 years).Limitations This study has a cross-sectional character, therefore, causal conclusions cannot be drawn.Conclusion Cancer survivors may require screening for anxiety disorders and long-term professional psychosocial support.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2018.12.019

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 11 · Cited by 22

Authors
Zeynalova, N., Schimpf, S., Setter, C., Yahiaoui-Doktor, M., Zeynalova, S., Lordick, F., Loeffler, M., & Hinz, A.
Affiliations
  • Leipzig University (DE)
  • University Hospital Leipzig (DE)
  • University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (DE)
Corresponding author
Zeynalova, S.
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
246
Pages
640-642
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2904279341
Cited by
22
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • European Regional Development Fund
  • Universität Leipzig
  • LIFE programme
  • European Commission
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
cancer survivors, anxiety disorders, generalized anxiety disorder, GAD-7, cancer history, socioeconomic status, gender differences, age, psychosocial support, anxiety screening, comorbidities
MeSH terms
Cancer Survivors, Patient Health Questionnaire, Aged, Anxiety Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Medical History Taking, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Surveys and Questionnaires, Comorbidity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review