Cited by 127Treatment of Major DepressionStress Responses and CortisolNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

The enriched environment ameliorates chronic unpredictable mild stress-induced depressive-like behaviors and cognitive impairment by activating the SIRT1/miR-134 signaling pathway in hippocampus

Shen, Jun, Li, Yaqing, Qu, Chujie, Xu, Linling, Sun, Huimin, Zhang, Junjian·2019·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS) is an important risk factor for depression and cognitive deficits in humans. Enriched environment (EE) showed a beneficial effect on depression and cognition by enhancing brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) expression and synaptic plasticity. However, it is still not clearly understood whether an epigenetic mechanism is involved in the BDNF modulation and synaptic plasticity that occurs after EE treatment for the depressive-like behaviors and cognitive deficits elicited by CUMS. In this study, we investigated the possible mechanism of the neuroprotective effect of EE. Methods All rats were exposed to the 5-week CUMS procedure except the control group. After CUMS procedure, some rats were stereotaxically injected with SIRT1 pharmacologic inhibitor EX527 or SIRT1 knocking down lentivirus (sh-SIRT1) in the hippocampus followed by EE treatment for 3 weeks. Other rats were directly subjected to EE treatment without stereotaxic injection. Behavioral tests were used to appraise depression and cognition after EE treatment. Then epigenetic molecules, synaptic proteins, dendritic spine density and branches, and synaptic morphology of the dorsal hippocampus were determined. Results We found that CUMS induced depressive-like behaviors including decreased sucrose preference ratio, prolonged immobility and reduced locomotor and exploratory activity; cognitive deficits including spatial learning and memory impairment; reduced dendriti…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2019.01.031

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 36 · Cited by 127

Authors
Shen, J., Li, Y., Qu, C., Xu, L., Sun, H., & Zhang, J.
Affiliations
Wuhan University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Junjian
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-04
Volume
248
Pages
81-90
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2912054742
Cited by
127
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 6
FWCI
10.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (81371196, 81771151)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
environmental enrichment, chronic unpredictable mild stress, depression, cognitive impairment, SIRT1, miR-134, hippocampus, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, synaptic plasticity, dendritic spine density, postsynaptic density, synaptophysin, PSD-95, EX527, shRNA knockdown, epigenetic regulation, spatial learning and memory, neuroprotection, antidepressants
MeSH terms
Animals, Carbazoles, Chronic Disease, Depression, Disease Models, Animal, Hippocampus, Male, Neuronal Plasticity, Socioenvironmental Therapy, Stress, Psychological, Signal Transduction, Synaptophysin, Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor, MicroRNAs, Rats, Sirtuin 1, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review