Cited by 172Physical Activity and HealthCardiac Health and Mental HealthCardiovascular and exercise physiology

The association between cardiorespiratory fitness and the incidence of common mental health disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Kandola, A., Ashdown-Franks, G., Stubbs, B., Osborn, D.P.J., Hayes, J.F.·2019·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Physical activity is associated with a lower incidence of common mental health disorder, but less is known about the impact of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF). METHODS: In this review, we systematically evaluated the relationship between CRF and the incidence of common mental health disorders in prospective cohort studies. We systematically searched six major electronic databases from inception to 23rd of May 2019. We assessed study quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. RESULTS: = 87.20) CRF are associated with a 47% and 23% greater risk of a common mental health disorders respectively, compared with high CRF. We found evidence to suggest a dose-response relationship between CRF and the risk of common mental health disorders. LIMITATIONS: We were only able to identify a small number of eligible studies from our search and heterogeneity was substantial in the subsequent meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that there is a longitudinal association between CRF levels and the risk of a common mental health disorder. CRF levels could be useful for identifying and preventing common mental health disorders at a population-level.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2019.07.088

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cardiorespiratory fitness reduces risk of psychiatric disorders.

    “with growing evidence of cardiorespiratory fitness itself reducing risk of psychiatric disorders 85-87”

    From A meta-review of "lifestyle psychiatry": the role of exercise, smoking, diet and sleep in the prevention and treatment of mental disorders (2020) · cites this paper as [85]

    The Conclusion reports that lower cardiorespiratory fitness is associated with greater risk of common mental health disorders, with a dose-response relationship. It does not establish that fitness itself causes the risk reduction, and its findings concern common mental health disorders rather than psychiatric disorders generally. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • There is a dose-response association between greater PA and mental health functioning across various exercise modalities, even after accounting for numerous social, medical, and behavioral confounds.

    “Across various exercise modalities, there appears to be a dose-response association between greater PA and mental health functioning (4), even after accounting for numerous social, medical, and behavioral confounds, such as smoking (OR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.61–0.75) (5).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 89 · Cited by 172

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Dishman R.K. Sui X. Church T.S. Hand G.A. Trivedi M.H. Blair S.N. Decline in cardiorespiratory fitness and odds of incident depression Am. J. Prev. Med. 43 4 2012 361 368 Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749379712004369 22992353 PMC3478961

Authors
Kandola, A., Ashdown-Franks, G., Stubbs, B., Osborn, D. P. J., & Hayes, J. F.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Kandola, A.
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
257
Pages
748-757
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2964850361
Cited by
172
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
cardiorespiratory fitness, common mental disorders, depression, anxiety, incidence, physical activity, dose-response relationship, mental health prevention
MeSH terms
Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Adult, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Incidence, Proportional Hazards Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review